On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 09:30:47AM +0100, Grant Likely wrote:
>On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 3:46 AM, Wei Yang wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 07:26:27PM +0100, Grant Likely wrote:
>>>On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 2:56 AM, Wei Yang wrote:
Currently, powernv platform is not aware of VFs. This means no
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 09:30:47AM +0100, Grant Likely wrote:
>On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 3:46 AM, Wei Yang wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 07:26:27PM +0100, Grant Likely wrote:
>>>On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 2:56 AM, Wei Yang wrote:
Currently, powernv platform is not aware of VFs. This means no
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 3:46 AM, Wei Yang wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 07:26:27PM +0100, Grant Likely wrote:
>>On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 2:56 AM, Wei Yang wrote:
>>> Currently, powernv platform is not aware of VFs. This means no dev-node
>>> represents a VF. Also, VF PCI device is created when
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 07:26:27PM +0100, Grant Likely wrote:
>On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 2:56 AM, Wei Yang wrote:
>> Currently, powernv platform is not aware of VFs. This means no dev-node
>> represents a VF. Also, VF PCI device is created when PF driver want to enable
>> it. This leads to the pdn->
On Wed, 2014-06-18 at 19:26 +0100, Grant Likely wrote:
> I don't think this is the right way to handle this. Unless it is a
> fixup to a buggy devicetree provided by firmware, I don't want to see
> any code modifying the devicetree to describe stuff that is able to be
> directly enumerated. Really
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 2:56 AM, Wei Yang wrote:
> Currently, powernv platform is not aware of VFs. This means no dev-node
> represents a VF. Also, VF PCI device is created when PF driver want to enable
> it. This leads to the pdn->pdev and pdn->pe_number an invalid value.
>
> This patch create/re
Currently, powernv platform is not aware of VFs. This means no dev-node
represents a VF. Also, VF PCI device is created when PF driver want to enable
it. This leads to the pdn->pdev and pdn->pe_number an invalid value.
This patch create/release dev-node for VF and fixs this when a VF's pci_dev
is