Applied. I'll put this to 4.14 PR.
/Jarkko
On Sat, Aug 19, 2017 at 08:18:59PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> Ugh. I'll apply this. My apologies.
>
> /Jarkko
>
> On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 12:21:45AM +0200, msuchanek wrote:
> > ping?
> >
> > On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 20:35:16 +0100
> > Michal Suchanek
Ugh. I'll apply this. My apologies.
/Jarkko
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 12:21:45AM +0200, msuchanek wrote:
> ping?
>
> On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 20:35:16 +0100
> Michal Suchanek wrote:
>
> > The crq is passed in registers and is the same on BE and LE hosts.
> > However, current implementation allocates
ping?
On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 20:35:16 +0100
Michal Suchanek wrote:
> The crq is passed in registers and is the same on BE and LE hosts.
> However, current implementation allocates a structure on-stack to
> represent the crq, initializes the members swapping them to BE, and
> loads the structure swa
The crq is passed in registers and is the same on BE and LE hosts.
However, current implementation allocates a structure on-stack to
represent the crq, initializes the members swapping them to BE, and
loads the structure swapping it from BE. This is pointless and causes
GCC warnings about ununitial
