On Sun, 13 Jan 2008, Jon Smirl wrote:
On 1/13/08, Jean Delvare [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 11:26:07 -0500, Jon Smirl wrote:
On 1/13/08, Jean Delvare [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 10:14:14 -0500, Jon Smirl wrote:
On 1/13/08, Jean Delvare [EMAIL
On 1/14/08, Geert Uytterhoeven [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 13 Jan 2008, Jon Smirl wrote:
On 1/13/08, Jean Delvare [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 11:26:07 -0500, Jon Smirl wrote:
On 1/13/08, Jean Delvare [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 10:14:14 -0500,
Hi Geert,
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 11:57:52 +0100 (CET), Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Sun, 13 Jan 2008, Jon Smirl wrote:
I don't know exactly what those modules tables are used for. I just
copied what the other subsystems do. Maybe they are used when you make
an initrd to know which drivers to
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008, Jean Delvare wrote:
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 11:57:52 +0100 (CET), Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Sun, 13 Jan 2008, Jon Smirl wrote:
I don't know exactly what those modules tables are used for. I just
copied what the other subsystems do. Maybe they are used when you make
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 18:08:16 +0100 (CET), Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008, Jean Delvare wrote:
I thought that the module aliases were generated by
scripts/mod/modpost? As a matter of fact, I did not apply Jon's patch
Sorry, you're right. Too early in the morning :-)
to
On Jan 14, 2008 6:50 PM, Jean Delvare [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 18:08:16 +0100 (CET), Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008, Jean Delvare wrote:
I thought that the module aliases were generated by
scripts/mod/modpost? As a matter of fact, I did not apply Jon's
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 20:38:28 +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
On Jan 14, 2008 6:50 PM, Jean Delvare [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am under the impression that modules.*map are the old way to get
automatic driver loading and aliases are the new way to do the same.
But maybe that's just me.
Right,
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 21:39:37 -0500, Jon Smirl wrote:
Follow on to: Series to add device tree naming to i2c
Teach module-init-tools about the i2c subsystem.
Can you please explain what this patch does and why it is needed?
--
Jean Delvare
___
On 1/13/08, Jean Delvare [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 21:39:37 -0500, Jon Smirl wrote:
Follow on to: Series to add device tree naming to i2c
Teach module-init-tools about the i2c subsystem.
Can you please explain what this patch does and why it is needed?
It generates the
On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 10:14:14 -0500, Jon Smirl wrote:
On 1/13/08, Jean Delvare [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 21:39:37 -0500, Jon Smirl wrote:
Follow on to: Series to add device tree naming to i2c
Teach module-init-tools about the i2c subsystem.
Can you please explain
On 1/13/08, Jean Delvare [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 10:14:14 -0500, Jon Smirl wrote:
On 1/13/08, Jean Delvare [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 21:39:37 -0500, Jon Smirl wrote:
Follow on to: Series to add device tree naming to i2c
Teach module-init-tools
On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 11:26:07 -0500, Jon Smirl wrote:
On 1/13/08, Jean Delvare [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 10:14:14 -0500, Jon Smirl wrote:
On 1/13/08, Jean Delvare [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 21:39:37 -0500, Jon Smirl wrote:
Follow on to: Series to
On 1/13/08, Jean Delvare [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 11:26:07 -0500, Jon Smirl wrote:
On 1/13/08, Jean Delvare [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 10:14:14 -0500, Jon Smirl wrote:
On 1/13/08, Jean Delvare [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007
13 matches
Mail list logo
