On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 16:23 -0500, Joel Schopp wrote:
> >> We haven't defined a user-visible feature bit (and besides, we're really
> >> getting short on these...). This is becoming a bit of concern btw (the
> >> running out of bits). Maybe we should start defining an AT_HWCAP2 for
> >> powerpc and
We haven't defined a user-visible feature bit (and besides, we're really
getting short on these...). This is becoming a bit of concern btw (the
running out of bits). Maybe we should start defining an AT_HWCAP2 for
powerpc and get libc updated to pick it up ?
Joel,
Any thoughts?
Is it a r
On Fri, 2008-07-04 at 09:39 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-06-18 at 17:32 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Andrew,
> >
> > The first patch in this series hits architecture independent code, but the
> > rest is contained in the powerpc subtree. Could you pick up the first
>
On Wed, 2008-06-18 at 17:32 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Andrew,
>
> The first patch in this series hits architecture independent code, but the
> rest is contained in the powerpc subtree. Could you pick up the first
> patch into -mm? I can send the rest of them through the powerpc git tree.
Andrew,
The first patch in this series hits architecture independent code, but the
rest is contained in the powerpc subtree. Could you pick up the first
patch into -mm? I can send the rest of them through the powerpc git tree.
The first patch and the rest of the set are independent and can be me
