Re: [stable] [PATCH 2/2] x86-64: seccomp: fix 32/64 syscall hole

2009-02-28 Thread Greg KH
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 09:23:36AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Fri, 27 Feb 2009, Roland McGrath wrote: > > But here is the patch you asked for. > > Yes, this looks much more straightforward. > > And I guess the seccomp interaction means that this is potentially a > 2.6.29 thing. Not that

Re: [stable] [PATCH 2/2] x86-64: seccomp: fix 32/64 syscall hole

2009-02-28 Thread Arjan van de Ven
On Sat, 28 Feb 2009 09:46:01 -0800 Greg KH wrote: > On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 09:23:36AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Fri, 27 Feb 2009, Roland McGrath wrote: > > > But here is the patch you asked for. > > > > Yes, this looks much more straightforward. > > > > And I guess the seccomp inter

Re: [stable] [PATCH 2/2] x86-64: seccomp: fix 32/64 syscall hole

2009-02-28 Thread Greg KH
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 09:54:33AM -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On Sat, 28 Feb 2009 09:46:01 -0800 > Greg KH wrote: > > > On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 09:23:36AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > On Fri, 27 Feb 2009, Roland McGrath wrote: > > > > But here is the patch you asked for. > > > > > >

Re: [stable] [PATCH 2/2] x86-64: seccomp: fix 32/64 syscall hole

2009-02-28 Thread Greg KH
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 10:23:13AM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 09:54:33AM -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > On Sat, 28 Feb 2009 09:46:01 -0800 > > Greg KH wrote: > > > > > On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 09:23:36AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > On Fri, 27 Feb 2009, Roland McGr