Re: 2.6.31-rc5-git2 crash on a idle system.

2009-08-06 Thread Sachin Sant
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: Thanks. Since it's a memory corruption (or seems to be) however, it's possible that the bisection will mislead you. IE. The culprit could be somewhere else, and the commit you'll find via bisection just happens to move things around in the kernel in such a way that

Re: 2.6.31-rc5-git2 crash on a idle system.

2009-08-06 Thread Michael Ellerman
On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 19:03 +0530, Sachin Sant wrote: Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: Thanks. Since it's a memory corruption (or seems to be) however, it's possible that the bisection will mislead you. IE. The culprit could be somewhere else, and the commit you'll find via bisection just

Re: 2.6.31-rc5-git2 crash on a idle system.

2009-08-06 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 19:03 +0530, Sachin Sant wrote: I added few printks in the initcall debug code patch. The o/p suggests that by the time first initicall debug message is printed the code is already corrupted. Further debug suggests, when start_kernel() is called the code at

Re: 2.6.31-rc5-git2 crash on a idle system.

2009-08-05 Thread Sachin Sant
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 17:57 +0530, Sachin Sant wrote: I have a power6 blade [IBM,7998-61X] running 2.6.31-rc5-git2 kernel (a33a052f19a21d727847391c8c1aff3fb221c472). After some period of inactivity the machine drops into xmon with following traces. Looks

Re: 2.6.31-rc5-git2 crash on a idle system.

2009-08-05 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2.6.31-rc5-git1 (4905f92ed752d49ebe9cce4fe78a4bc39e710523) works fine on this box without any problem. So the problem was introduced between 2.6.31-rc5-git1 (4905f92ed752d49ebe9cce4fe78a4bc39e710523) and 2.6.31-rc5-git2 (a33a052f19a21d727847391c8c1aff3fb221c472). Looking at the changelog