On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Mitsutaka Amano
wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 11:05 AM, tiejun.chen
> wrote:
>> Mitsutaka Amano wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 3:48 PM, tiejun.chen
>>> wrote:
Mitsutaka Amano wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm testing the ppc platform is based on
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 11:05 AM, tiejun.chen wrote:
> Mitsutaka Amano wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 3:48 PM, tiejun.chen
>> wrote:
>>> Mitsutaka Amano wrote:
Hi all,
I'm testing the ppc platform is based on mpc85xx. 256MB Flash memory
has been installed. Then I found thi
Mitsutaka Amano wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm testing the ppc platform is based on mpc85xx. 256MB Flash memory
> has been installed. Then I found this entries.
>
> /proc/vmallocinfo
> ~~~
> 0xc910-0xd9101000 268439552 of_flash_probe+0x290/0x814 ioremap
>
> physmap_of allocated 268MB over to the v
Hi all,
I'm testing the ppc platform is based on mpc85xx. 256MB Flash memory
has been installed. Then I found this entries.
/proc/vmallocinfo
~~~
0xc910-0xd9101000 268439552 of_flash_probe+0x290/0x814 ioremap
physmap_of allocated 268MB over to the vmalloc. vmalloc space is tight.
Why does w