CAN Subsystem and MPC52xx onboard controller

2010-06-10 Thread Roman Fietze
Hello List Members, I have tried multiple versions/branches and git repos (torvalds, benh/{next,master}, denx, pengutronix, ...) to get a 2.6.34 or HEAD version of that repos that compiles w/o errors when the CAN subsystem is enabled and the MPC5xxx onboard driver is selected starting with the

Re: CAN Subsystem and MPC52xx onboard controller

2010-06-10 Thread Wolfram Sang
And which one is good or better for CAN+MPC52xx if that's different? The mainline kernel works fine here with Phytec based MPC5xxx-boards. Some custom boards, too. You probably already know that it is always best to stay as close to mainline as possible ;) Maybe just the lite-support is

Re: CAN Subsystem and MPC52xx onboard controller

2010-06-10 Thread Wolfgang Grandegger
On 06/10/2010 10:41 AM, Roman Fietze wrote: Hello List Members, I have tried multiple versions/branches and git repos (torvalds, benh/{next,master}, denx, pengutronix, ...) to get a 2.6.34 or HEAD version of that repos that compiles w/o errors when the CAN subsystem is enabled and the

Re: CAN Subsystem and MPC52xx onboard controller

2010-06-10 Thread Roman Fietze
Hello Wolfram, On Thursday 10 June 2010 10:59:23 Wolfram Sang wrote: The mainline kernel works fine here with Phytec based MPC5xxx-boards. Reading your answer made me hope again, and I just pulled the newest HEAD from the mainline kernel and tried it once more. Now it compiles. Thanks for

Re: CAN Subsystem and MPC52xx onboard controller

2010-06-10 Thread Wolfgang Grandegger
On 06/10/2010 11:29 AM, Roman Fietze wrote: Hello Wolfram, On Thursday 10 June 2010 10:59:23 Wolfram Sang wrote: The mainline kernel works fine here with Phytec based MPC5xxx-boards. Reading your answer made me hope again, and I just pulled the newest HEAD from the mainline kernel and