On 02/20/2020 at 12:48 PM Christophe Leroy wrote:
> Le 20/02/2020 à 18:34, Radu Rendec a écrit :
> > On 02/20/2020 at 11:25 AM Christophe Leroy wrote:
> >> Le 20/02/2020 à 17:02, Radu Rendec a écrit :
> >>> On 02/20/2020 at 3:38 AM Christophe Leroy wrote:
> On 02/19/2020 10:39 PM, Radu Rend
Le 20/02/2020 à 18:34, Radu Rendec a écrit :
On 02/20/2020 at 11:25 AM Christophe Leroy wrote:
Le 20/02/2020 à 17:02, Radu Rendec a écrit :
On 02/20/2020 at 3:38 AM Christophe Leroy wrote:
On 02/19/2020 10:39 PM, Radu Rendec wrote:
On 02/19/2020 at 4:21 PM Christophe Leroy wrote:
Inter
On 02/20/2020 at 11:25 AM Christophe Leroy wrote:
> Le 20/02/2020 à 17:02, Radu Rendec a écrit :
> > On 02/20/2020 at 3:38 AM Christophe Leroy wrote:
> >> On 02/19/2020 10:39 PM, Radu Rendec wrote:
> >>> On 02/19/2020 at 4:21 PM Christophe Leroy wrote:
> > Interesting.
> >
> > 0x900
Le 20/02/2020 à 17:02, Radu Rendec a écrit :
On 02/20/2020 at 3:38 AM Christophe Leroy wrote:
On 02/19/2020 10:39 PM, Radu Rendec wrote:
On 02/19/2020 at 4:21 PM Christophe Leroy wrote:
Interesting.
0x900 is the adress of the timer interrupt.
Would the MCE occur just after the timer int
On 02/20/2020 at 3:38 AM Christophe Leroy wrote:
> On 02/19/2020 10:39 PM, Radu Rendec wrote:
> > On 02/19/2020 at 4:21 PM Christophe Leroy wrote:
> >>> Interesting.
> >>>
> >>> 0x900 is the adress of the timer interrupt.
> >>>
> >>> Would the MCE occur just after the timer interrupt ?
> >
> > I
On 02/19/2020 10:39 PM, Radu Rendec wrote:
On 02/19/2020 at 4:21 PM Christophe Leroy wrote:
Radu Rendec a écrit :
On 02/19/2020 at 10:11 AM Radu Rendec wrote:
On 02/18/2020 at 1:08 PM Christophe Leroy wrote:
Le 18/02/2020 à 18:07, Radu Rendec a écrit :
The saved NIP seems to be broken
On 02/19/2020 at 4:21 PM Christophe Leroy wrote:
> > Radu Rendec a écrit :
> >> On 02/19/2020 at 10:11 AM Radu Rendec wrote:
> >>> On 02/18/2020 at 1:08 PM Christophe Leroy wrote:
> Le 18/02/2020 à 18:07, Radu Rendec a écrit :
> > The saved NIP seems to be broken inside machine_check_
Christophe Leroy a écrit :
Radu Rendec a écrit :
On 02/19/2020 at 10:11 AM Radu Rendec wrote:
On 02/18/2020 at 1:08 PM Christophe Leroy wrote:
Le 18/02/2020 à 18:07, Radu Rendec a écrit :
> The saved NIP seems to be broken inside machine_check_exception() on
> MPC8378, running Linux 4.9.
Radu Rendec a écrit :
On 02/19/2020 at 10:11 AM Radu Rendec wrote:
On 02/18/2020 at 1:08 PM Christophe Leroy wrote:
> Le 18/02/2020 à 18:07, Radu Rendec a écrit :
> > The saved NIP seems to be broken inside machine_check_exception() on
> > MPC8378, running Linux 4.9.191. The value is 0x900 m
On 02/19/2020 at 10:11 AM Radu Rendec wrote:
> On 02/18/2020 at 1:08 PM Christophe Leroy wrote:
> > Le 18/02/2020 à 18:07, Radu Rendec a écrit :
> > > The saved NIP seems to be broken inside machine_check_exception() on
> > > MPC8378, running Linux 4.9.191. The value is 0x900 most of the times,
>
On 02/18/2020 at 1:08 PM Christophe Leroy wrote:
> Le 18/02/2020 à 18:07, Radu Rendec a écrit :
> > The saved NIP seems to be broken inside machine_check_exception() on
> > MPC8378, running Linux 4.9.191. The value is 0x900 most of the times,
> > but I have seen other weird values.
> >
> > I've be
Le 18/02/2020 à 18:07, Radu Rendec a écrit :
Hi Everyone,
The saved NIP seems to be broken inside machine_check_exception() on
MPC8378, running Linux 4.9.191. The value is 0x900 most of the times,
but I have seen other weird values.
I've been able to track down the entry code to head_32.S (v
Hi Everyone,
The saved NIP seems to be broken inside machine_check_exception() on
MPC8378, running Linux 4.9.191. The value is 0x900 most of the times,
but I have seen other weird values.
I've been able to track down the entry code to head_32.S (vector 0x200),
but I'm not sure where/how the NIP v
13 matches
Mail list logo