Hi,
On 6/27/08, Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 02:29:29PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > current linux version is 2.6.26-rc8 and I think this is the right time
> > to send latest patches againts rc8 for Microblaze CPU.
> >...
>
> Thanks for your work on
rg;
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Microblaze init port v4
>
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 08:50:37PM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
> > Hi Adrian,
> >
> > > On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 02:29:29PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > &g
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 08:50:37PM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
> Hi Adrian,
>
> > On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 02:29:29PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> Hi everybody,
> >>
> >> current linux version is 2.6.26-rc8 and I think this is the right time
> >> to send latest patches againts rc8 for Microb
Hi Arnd,
> On Thursday 26 June 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> We have there still problem with syscalls and we don't have chance to
>> fix it to stable version, this is not part which I can do yourself.
>> Microblaze will be n + 1 platform which use some old syscalls.
>> I hope you understan
Hi Adrian,
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 02:29:29PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Hi everybody,
>>
>> current linux version is 2.6.26-rc8 and I think this is the right time
>> to send latest patches againts rc8 for Microblaze CPU.
>> ...
>
> Thanks for your work on getting the architecture inclu
Arnd Bergmann wrote:
* You are using sys_ipc and sys_socketcall instead of the
broken-out syscalls, which is a direct consequence of following
the i386 numbering scheme.
Please pretty please kill, kill, kill...
-hpa
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing
On Thursday 26 June 2008, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> That still leaves the problem that a lot of your syscalls have bugs
> copied from other platforms. If you need to maintain backwards compatibility
> with your existing binaries, that's fine, but please fix the code you are
> adding.
Sorry for my ha
On Thursday 26 June 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> We have there still problem with syscalls and we don't have chance to
> fix it to stable version, this is not part which I can do yourself.
> Microblaze will be n + 1 platform which use some old syscalls.
> I hope you understand.
That still l
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 02:29:29PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> current linux version is 2.6.26-rc8 and I think this is the right time
> to send latest patches againts rc8 for Microblaze CPU.
>...
Thanks for your work on getting the architecture included.
I have two questi
Hi everybody,
current linux version is 2.6.26-rc8 and I think this is the right time
to send latest patches againts rc8 for Microblaze CPU.
I fixed there some issues which were reported to me.
We have there still problem with syscalls and we don't have chance to
fix it to stable version, this i
10 matches
Mail list logo