Re: Microblaze init port v4

2008-06-26 Thread John Williams
Hi, On 6/27/08, Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 02:29:29PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > current linux version is 2.6.26-rc8 and I think this is the right time > > to send latest patches againts rc8 for Microblaze CPU. > >... > > Thanks for your work on

RE: Microblaze init port v4

2008-06-26 Thread Stephen Neuendorffer
rg; > [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Microblaze init port v4 > > On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 08:50:37PM +0200, Michal Simek wrote: > > Hi Adrian, > > > > > On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 02:29:29PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > &g

Re: Microblaze init port v4

2008-06-26 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 08:50:37PM +0200, Michal Simek wrote: > Hi Adrian, > > > On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 02:29:29PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> Hi everybody, > >> > >> current linux version is 2.6.26-rc8 and I think this is the right time > >> to send latest patches againts rc8 for Microb

Re: Microblaze init port v4

2008-06-26 Thread Michal Simek
Hi Arnd, > On Thursday 26 June 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> We have there still problem with syscalls and we don't have chance to >> fix it to stable version, this is not part which I can do yourself. >> Microblaze will be n + 1 platform which use some old syscalls. >> I hope you understan

Re: Microblaze init port v4

2008-06-26 Thread Michal Simek
Hi Adrian, > On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 02:29:29PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Hi everybody, >> >> current linux version is 2.6.26-rc8 and I think this is the right time >> to send latest patches againts rc8 for Microblaze CPU. >> ... > > Thanks for your work on getting the architecture inclu

Re: Microblaze init port v4

2008-06-26 Thread H. Peter Anvin
Arnd Bergmann wrote: * You are using sys_ipc and sys_socketcall instead of the broken-out syscalls, which is a direct consequence of following the i386 numbering scheme. Please pretty please kill, kill, kill... -hpa ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing

Re: Microblaze init port v4

2008-06-26 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Thursday 26 June 2008, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > That still leaves the problem that a lot of your syscalls have bugs > copied from other platforms. If you need to maintain backwards compatibility > with your existing binaries, that's fine, but please fix the code you are > adding. Sorry for my ha

Re: Microblaze init port v4

2008-06-26 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Thursday 26 June 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > We have there still problem with syscalls and we don't have chance to > fix it to stable version, this is not part which I can do yourself. > Microblaze will be n + 1 platform which use some old syscalls. > I hope you understand. That still l

Re: Microblaze init port v4

2008-06-26 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 02:29:29PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi everybody, > > current linux version is 2.6.26-rc8 and I think this is the right time > to send latest patches againts rc8 for Microblaze CPU. >... Thanks for your work on getting the architecture included. I have two questi

Microblaze init port v4

2008-06-26 Thread monstr
Hi everybody, current linux version is 2.6.26-rc8 and I think this is the right time to send latest patches againts rc8 for Microblaze CPU. I fixed there some issues which were reported to me. We have there still problem with syscalls and we don't have chance to fix it to stable version, this i