On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Nathan Fontenot wrote:
> On 07/16/2014 05:26 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Grant Likely
>> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 12:30 PM, Tyrel Datwyler
>>> wrote:
On 07/15/2014 10:33 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> I've got anothe
On 07/16/2014 05:26 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 12:30 PM, Tyrel Datwyler
>> wrote:
>>> On 07/15/2014 10:33 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
I've got another question about powerpc reconfiguration. I was looking
at the
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 12:30 PM, Tyrel Datwyler
> wrote:
>> On 07/15/2014 10:33 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
>>> I've got another question about powerpc reconfiguration. I was looking
>>> at the dlpar_configure_connector() function in dlpar.c. I
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 12:30 PM, Tyrel Datwyler
wrote:
> On 07/15/2014 10:33 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
>> I've got another question about powerpc reconfiguration. I was looking
>> at the dlpar_configure_connector() function in dlpar.c. I see that the
>> function has the ability to process multiple
On 07/15/2014 10:33 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> I've got another question about powerpc reconfiguration. I was looking
> at the dlpar_configure_connector() function in dlpar.c. I see that the
> function has the ability to process multiple nodes with additional
> sibling and child nodes. It appears to
I've got another question about powerpc reconfiguration. I was looking
at the dlpar_configure_connector() function in dlpar.c. I see that the
function has the ability to process multiple nodes with additional
sibling and child nodes. It appears to link them into a detached tree
structure, and the f
On 06/27/2014 07:41 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Jun 2014 15:01:49 -0500, Nathan Fontenot
> wrote:
>> On 06/25/2014 03:24 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
>>> On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 15:10:55 -0500, Nathan Fontenot
>>> wrote:
>> heh! I have often thought about adding reference counting to device
On 06/27/2014 07:40 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> Hi Grant,
>
> On Jun 27, 2014, at 3:32 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 26 Jun 2014 14:59:31 -0500, Nathan Fontenot
>> wrote:
>>> On 06/25/2014 03:22 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 15:07:05 -0500, Nathan Fontenot
wr
Hi Grant,
On Jun 27, 2014, at 3:32 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Jun 2014 14:59:31 -0500, Nathan Fontenot
> wrote:
>> On 06/25/2014 03:22 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
>>> On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 15:07:05 -0500, Nathan Fontenot
>>> wrote:
On 06/23/2014 09:58 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
> On
On Thu, 26 Jun 2014 15:01:49 -0500, Nathan Fontenot
wrote:
> On 06/25/2014 03:24 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> > On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 15:10:55 -0500, Nathan Fontenot
> > wrote:
> heh! I have often thought about adding reference counting to device tree
> properties.
> >>>
> >>> You horrible
On Thu, 26 Jun 2014 14:59:31 -0500, Nathan Fontenot
wrote:
> On 06/25/2014 03:22 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> > On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 15:07:05 -0500, Nathan Fontenot
> > wrote:
> >> On 06/23/2014 09:58 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 19 Jun 2014 11:33:20 +0300, Pantelis Antoniou
> >>> wrote:
On 06/25/2014 03:24 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 15:10:55 -0500, Nathan Fontenot
> wrote:
>> On 06/23/2014 09:48 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
>>> On Thu, 19 Jun 2014 10:26:15 -0500, Nathan Fontenot
>>> wrote:
On 06/18/2014 03:07 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> Hi Nathan and Tyrel
On 06/25/2014 03:22 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 15:07:05 -0500, Nathan Fontenot
> wrote:
>> On 06/23/2014 09:58 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
>>> On Thu, 19 Jun 2014 11:33:20 +0300, Pantelis Antoniou
>>> wrote:
Hi Grant,
CCing Thomas Gleixner & Steven Rostedt, since t
On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 15:10:55 -0500, Nathan Fontenot
wrote:
> On 06/23/2014 09:48 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
> > On Thu, 19 Jun 2014 10:26:15 -0500, Nathan Fontenot
> > wrote:
> >> On 06/18/2014 03:07 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> >>> Hi Nathan and Tyrel,
> >>>
> >>> I'm looking into lifecycle issues o
On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 15:07:05 -0500, Nathan Fontenot
wrote:
> On 06/23/2014 09:58 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
> > On Thu, 19 Jun 2014 11:33:20 +0300, Pantelis Antoniou
> > wrote:
> >> Hi Grant,
> >>
> >> CCing Thomas Gleixner & Steven Rostedt, since they might have a few
> >> ideas...
> >>
> >> On J
On 06/23/2014 09:48 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Jun 2014 10:26:15 -0500, Nathan Fontenot
> wrote:
>> On 06/18/2014 03:07 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
>>> Hi Nathan and Tyrel,
>>>
>>> I'm looking into lifecycle issues on nodes modified by OF_DYNAMIC, and
>>> I'm hoping you can help me. Right n
On 06/23/2014 09:58 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Jun 2014 11:33:20 +0300, Pantelis Antoniou
> wrote:
>> Hi Grant,
>>
>> CCing Thomas Gleixner & Steven Rostedt, since they might have a few
>> ideas...
>>
>> On Jun 18, 2014, at 11:07 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Nathan and Tyrel,
>>>
>
On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 18:26:04 +0300, Pantelis Antoniou
wrote:
> On Jun 23, 2014, at 5:58 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> > We'll also need a transition plan to move to RCU. I think the existing
> > iterators can be modified to do the rcu locking in-line, but still require
> > the of_node_get/put stuff (
Hi Grant,
On Jun 23, 2014, at 5:58 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Jun 2014 11:33:20 +0300, Pantelis Antoniou
> wrote:
>> Hi Grant,
>>
>> CCing Thomas Gleixner & Steven Rostedt, since they might have a few
>> ideas...
>>
>> On Jun 18, 2014, at 11:07 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Nat
On Thu, 19 Jun 2014 11:33:20 +0300, Pantelis Antoniou
wrote:
> Hi Grant,
>
> CCing Thomas Gleixner & Steven Rostedt, since they might have a few
> ideas...
>
> On Jun 18, 2014, at 11:07 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
>
> > Hi Nathan and Tyrel,
> >
> > I'm looking into lifecycle issues on nodes modif
On Thu, 19 Jun 2014 10:26:15 -0500, Nathan Fontenot
wrote:
> On 06/18/2014 03:07 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> > Hi Nathan and Tyrel,
> >
> > I'm looking into lifecycle issues on nodes modified by OF_DYNAMIC, and
> > I'm hoping you can help me. Right now, pseries seems to be the only
> > user of OF_
On 06/18/2014 03:07 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> Hi Nathan and Tyrel,
>
> I'm looking into lifecycle issues on nodes modified by OF_DYNAMIC, and
> I'm hoping you can help me. Right now, pseries seems to be the only
> user of OF_DYNAMIC, but making OF_DYNAMIC work has a huge impact on
> the entire ker
Hi Grant,
CCing Thomas Gleixner & Steven Rostedt, since they might have a few
ideas...
On Jun 18, 2014, at 11:07 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> Hi Nathan and Tyrel,
>
> I'm looking into lifecycle issues on nodes modified by OF_DYNAMIC, and
> I'm hoping you can help me. Right now, pseries seems to be
Hi Nathan and Tyrel,
I'm looking into lifecycle issues on nodes modified by OF_DYNAMIC, and
I'm hoping you can help me. Right now, pseries seems to be the only
user of OF_DYNAMIC, but making OF_DYNAMIC work has a huge impact on
the entire kernel because it requires all DT code to manage reference
24 matches
Mail list logo
