On Wed, 2015-09-16 at 18:23 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> With this commit applied, my MPC5200 board fails to boot 4.3-rc1. The
> boot failure is silent.
>
> Bisection pointed straight to this commit. Reverting it on top of
> 4.3-rc1 works like a charm.
Yes, we've been iterating on a fix for th
On Wed, 16 Sep 2015, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-09-16 at 18:23 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > With this commit applied, my MPC5200 board fails to boot 4.3-rc1. The
> > boot failure is silent.
> >
> > Bisection pointed straight to this commit. Reverting it on top of
> > 4.3-rc1 works like
On Wed, 2015-09-16 at 11:29 -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-09-16 at 18:23 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > With this commit applied, my MPC5200 board fails to boot 4.3-rc1. The
> > boot failure is silent.
> >
> > Bisection pointed straight to this commit. Reverting it on top of
> > 4.3-r
On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 22:01:06 +0200 (CEST)
Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Sep 2015, Scott Wood wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2015-09-16 at 18:23 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > With this commit applied, my MPC5200 board fails to boot 4.3-rc1. The
> > > boot failure is silent.
> > >
> > > Bisecti
On Wed, 2015-09-16 at 21:54 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 22:01:06 +0200 (CEST)
> Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 16 Sep 2015, Scott Wood wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, 2015-09-16 at 18:23 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > > With this commit applied, my MPC5200 board fails
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 12:50:12PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-09-16 at 21:54 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > This could be a symptom and not the problem. What the above shows is
> > that ftrace tried to convert the mcount at change_protection but what
> > it expected was there w
From: Segher Boessenkool
> Sent: 17 September 2015 04:19
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 12:50:12PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > On Wed, 2015-09-16 at 21:54 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > This could be a symptom and not the problem. What the above shows is
> > > that ftrace tried to convert the
On Wed, 16 Sep 2015, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 22:01:06 +0200 (CEST)
> Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > So now I have to chase down that one:
> >
> > [0.230210] ftrace: allocating 16560 entries in 49 pages
> > [0.273313] [ cut here ]
> > [0.278048]
On Thu, 17 Sep 2015 12:13:15 +0200 (CEST)
Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Digging deeper. My assumption that it's a post powerpc merge failure
> turned out to be wrong.
Does 4.2 have the problem?
>
> Some more data points. I see the above splat with
>
> CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACER=y
> CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRA
On Thu, 17 Sep 2015, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Sep 2015 12:13:15 +0200 (CEST)
> Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> > Digging deeper. My assumption that it's a post powerpc merge failure
> > turned out to be wrong.
>
> Does 4.2 have the problem?
No. Neither does
4c92b5bb1422: Merge branch 'p
On Thu, 17 Sep 2015 16:38:52 +0200 (CEST)
Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Sep 2015, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 17 Sep 2015 12:13:15 +0200 (CEST)
> > Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >
> > > Digging deeper. My assumption that it's a post powerpc merge failure
> > > turned out to be wrong.
On Thu, 17 Sep 2015, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Sep 2015 16:38:52 +0200 (CEST)
> Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 17 Sep 2015, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 17 Sep 2015 12:13:15 +0200 (CEST)
> > > Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > >
> > > > Digging deeper. My assumption that it
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 04:38:52PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> [2.398263] Instruction dump:
> [2.401297] 0100 00037000 f000 0001 0a641e09
> acde4823
> [2.409237] 000f 179a7b00 07de2900 03ef1480 <01f78a40> 0001c200
> 6000 9421fff0
Those are
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 09:47:39AM +, David Laight wrote:
> > It also says "tftp", which is intriguing if nothing else :-)
>
> Much more likely than the above instruction.
> If the address it wass read from is in the dump, look at the entire string.
And tell us what network drivers you use, w
On Thu, 2015-09-17 at 12:13 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Sep 2015, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 22:01:06 +0200 (CEST)
> > Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > So now I have to chase down that one:
> > >
> > > [0.230210] ftrace: allocating 16560 entries in 49 pages
> > >
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 08:01:57PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Weird.
>
> Can you try:
>
> d690740f22f6 ("powerpc/powernv: Enable LEDS support")
>
> That is the commit before my merge of Scott's tree, which had all the
> Freescale
> & 32-bit stuff.
>
> If that works, it would isolate it
On Fri, 18 Sep 2015, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 08:01:57PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > Weird.
> >
> > Can you try:
> >
> > d690740f22f6 ("powerpc/powernv: Enable LEDS support")
> >
> > That is the commit before my merge of Scott's tree, which had all the
> > F
On Fri, 2015-09-18 at 16:45 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Sep 2015, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 08:01:57PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > > Weird.
> > >
> > > Can you try:
> > >
> > > d690740f22f6 ("powerpc/powernv: Enable LEDS support")
> > >
> >
On Mon, 2015-09-21 at 17:10 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-09-18 at 16:45 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Fri, 18 Sep 2015, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 08:01:57PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > > > Weird.
> > > >
> > > > Can you try:
> > > >
19 matches
Mail list logo
