On 07/29/2009 12:03 PM, ashish kalra wrote:
From: Ashish Kalra ashish.ka...@freescale.com
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 21:15:49 +0530
Fix for non-ncq ncq commands causing timeouts when both are issued
simultaneously to the same device.
Signed-off-by: Ashish Kalra ashish.ka...@freescale.com
---
Hello,
Signed-off-by: Ashish Kalra ashish.ka...@freescale.com
---
drivers/ata/sata_fsl.c | 1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/ata/sata_fsl.c b/drivers/ata/sata_fsl.c
index 5a88b44..a33f130 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/sata_fsl.c
+++
On Jul 30, 2009, at 8:23 AM, Kalra Ashish-B00888 wrote:
Hello,
Signed-off-by: Ashish Kalra ashish.ka...@freescale.com
---
drivers/ata/sata_fsl.c | 1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/ata/sata_fsl.c b/drivers/ata/sata_fsl.c
index 5a88b44..a33f130
Hello Kumar,
This doesn't look like it should change anything. sata_fsl_ops
inherits
from sata_pmp_port_ops, which inherits from sata_port_ops, which
already
sets qc_defer to ata_std_qc_defer.
Oh, yes. Actually this patch was for older kernels where there
inheritence was not there.
On Jul 30, 2009, at 8:58 AM, Kalra Ashish-B00888 wrote:
Hello Kumar,
This doesn't look like it should change anything. sata_fsl_ops
inherits
from sata_pmp_port_ops, which inherits from sata_port_ops, which
already
sets qc_defer to ata_std_qc_defer.
Oh, yes. Actually this patch was
On 07/29/2009 10:03 AM, ashish kalra wrote:
From: Ashish Kalra ashish.ka...@freescale.com
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 21:15:49 +0530
Fix for non-ncq ncq commands causing timeouts when both are issued
simultaneously to the same device.
Signed-off-by: Ashish Kalra ashish.ka...@freescale.com
---
