On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 10:45:26AM -0500, Olof Johansson wrote:
>On Sun, Sep 05, 2010 at 10:19:53PM -0700, Tirumala Marri wrote:
>> >
>> > Then the device tree identifier, and the cpu setup functions, etc,
>> > should indicate
>> > 464, not APM821xx.
>> This is new SoC based on 464 cpu core. All th
> > CPU portion uses SoC name.
>
> Hm, you're right. Confusing.
>
> Still, the cpu setup functions would make more sense to have the core
> name in, not the SoC name. Especially since multiple SoC families might
> use the same core, etc.
[Marri] I agree. Probably we need another node which identifi
On Sun, Sep 05, 2010 at 10:19:53PM -0700, Tirumala Marri wrote:
> >
> > Then the device tree identifier, and the cpu setup functions, etc,
> > should indicate
> > 464, not APM821xx.
> This is new SoC based on 464 cpu core. All the previous SoC device tree
> CPU portion uses SoC name.
Hm, you're ri
> >Every new board needs new defconfig. And it is not same as others. It
> has
> >Different features from other.
>
> You make it sound as if that is a hard and fixed rule. It's not. Not
> all
> boards need a defconfig. Also, there was recent work to trim the
> defconfigs
> that exist today down
On Sun, Sep 05, 2010 at 10:19:53PM -0700, Tirumala Marri wrote:
>>
>> Then the device tree identifier, and the cpu setup functions, etc,
>> should indicate
>> 464, not APM821xx.
>This is new SoC based on 464 cpu core. All the previous SoC device tree
>CPU portion uses SoC name.
>
>>
>> Also, why ad
>
> Then the device tree identifier, and the cpu setup functions, etc,
> should indicate
> 464, not APM821xx.
This is new SoC based on 464 cpu core. All the previous SoC device tree
CPU portion uses SoC name.
>
> Also, why add yet another defconfig? Isn't the eval board similar to
> many others an
On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 01:38:46PM -0700, Tirumala Marri wrote:
> > >APM821xx is Applied Micro Circuits Corporations naming convention for
> > >new line of SoCs.
> >
> > So is it a 440x6 core then? Or what core is inside the SoC?
> [Marri] It is 464 core.
Then the device tree identifier, and the
> >APM821xx is Applied Micro Circuits Corporations naming convention for
> >new line of SoCs.
>
> So is it a 440x6 core then? Or what core is inside the SoC?
[Marri] It is 464 core.
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://list
On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 02:57:33PM -0700, tma...@apm.com wrote:
>From: Tirumala Marri
>
>This patch adds CPU, device tree, defconfig and bluestone board
>support for APM821xx SoC.
>
>Signed-off-by: Tirumala R Marri
>---
>APM821xx is Applied Micro Circuits Corporations naming convention for
>new l
