Ingo Molnar writes:
> Paul, you might also want to test the perfcounter bits of -tip on
> PowerPC a bit more frequently - this patch was there for 5 days before i
> sent it to Linus.
Yes, I'll try to do that in future.
I hope I didn't come across as blaming anyone for anything - that
wasn't my
>-Original Message-
>From: Paul Mackerras [mailto:pau...@samba.org]
>Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 8:45 AM
>Markus, please take care in future to mention it in the changelog if
>your patches touch definitions used by other architectures. If you
>could go so far as to use grep a bit mo
* Paul Mackerras wrote:
> Commit 5622f295 ("x86, perf_counter, bts: Optimize BTS overflow
> handling") removed the regs field from struct perf_sample_data and
> added a regs parameter to perf_counter_overflow(). This breaks the
> build on powerpc as reported by Sachin Sant:
>
> arch/powerpc/ke
* Heiko Carstens wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 09:30:43AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Metzger, Markus T wrote:
> >
> > > >-Original Message-
> > > >From: Paul Mackerras [mailto:pau...@samba.org]
> > > >Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 8:45 AM
> > >
> > >
> > > >Markus, pl
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 09:30:43AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Metzger, Markus T wrote:
>
> > >-Original Message-
> > >From: Paul Mackerras [mailto:pau...@samba.org]
> > >Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 8:45 AM
> >
> >
> > >Markus, please take care in future to mention it in the c
* Metzger, Markus T wrote:
> >-Original Message-
> >From: Paul Mackerras [mailto:pau...@samba.org]
> >Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 8:45 AM
>
>
> >Markus, please take care in future to mention it in the changelog if
> >your patches touch definitions used by other architectures. If
