On Dec 18, 2012, at 10:31 AM, Peter Bergner berg...@vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 07:28 -0600, Jimi Xenidis wrote:
On Dec 17, 2012, at 6:26 PM, Peter Bergner berg...@vnet.ibm.com wrote:
Jimi, are you using an old binutils from before my patch that
changed the operand order for
On Wed, 2013-01-09 at 16:19 -0600, Jimi Xenidis wrote:
I agree, but that means it is impossible for the same .S file can be compiled
but -mcpu=e500mc and -mcpu=powerpc? So either these files have to be Book3S
versus Book3E --or-- we use a CPP macro to get them right.
FWIW, I prefer the latter
On Dec 17, 2012, at 5:33 AM, Anton Blanchard an...@samba.org wrote:
Hi Jimi,
I know this is a little late, but shouldn't these power7 specific
thingies be in obj-$(CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S_64). The reason I ask is
that my compiler pukes on dcbtst and as I deal with that I wanted
to point this
On Dec 17, 2012, at 6:26 PM, Peter Bergner berg...@vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On Mon, 2012-12-17 at 22:33 +1100, Anton Blanchard wrote:
Hi Jimi,
I know this is a little late, but shouldn't these power7 specific
thingies be in obj-$(CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S_64). The reason I ask is
that my compiler
dcbtr0,r8,0b01010 /* GO */
.machine pop
Jimi, are you using an old binutils from before my patch that
changed the operand order for these types of instructions?
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2009-02/msg00044.html
Actually, this confused me as well, that
On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 07:28 -0600, Jimi Xenidis wrote:
On Dec 17, 2012, at 6:26 PM, Peter Bergner berg...@vnet.ibm.com wrote:
Jimi, are you using an old binutils from before my patch that
changed the operand order for these types of instructions?
Hi Jimi,
I know this is a little late, but shouldn't these power7 specific
thingies be in obj-$(CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S_64). The reason I ask is
that my compiler pukes on dcbtst and as I deal with that I wanted
to point this out.
I guess we could do that. It's a bit strange your assembler is
On Mon, 2012-12-17 at 22:33 +1100, Anton Blanchard wrote:
Hi Jimi,
I know this is a little late, but shouldn't these power7 specific
thingies be in obj-$(CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S_64). The reason I ask is
that my compiler pukes on dcbtst and as I deal with that I wanted
to point this out.
I
On May 31, 2012, at 1:22 AM, Anton Blanchard an...@samba.org wrote:
Implement a POWER7 optimised memcpy using VMX and enhanced prefetch
instructions.
snip
Index: linux-build/arch/powerpc/lib/Makefile
===
---
