We have two #defines that rename scanhex() and skipbl() to
xmon_scanhex() and xmon_skipbl() - but no one ever uses those
names.
It looks like they are there for namespace protection.
David
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 01:20:33AM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
We have two #defines that rename scanhex() and skipbl() to
xmon_scanhex() and xmon_skipbl() - but no one ever uses those
names.
So the only effect is to rename the actual symbols in the generated
code, and AFACIS there is no
On Wed, 2012-10-10 at 09:15 +1100, Paul Mackerras wrote:
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 01:20:33AM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
We have two #defines that rename scanhex() and skipbl() to
xmon_scanhex() and xmon_skipbl() - but no one ever uses those
names.
So the only effect is to rename the
