On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 2:52 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2023, at 14:13, Biju Das wrote:
> > FYI, this patch breaks on RZ/G2L SMARC EVK board and Arnd will send V2
> > for fixing this issue.
> >
> > [10:53] [3.384408] Unable to handle kernel paging request at
> > virtual address
Hi all,
FYI, this patch breaks on RZ/G2L SMARC EVK board and Arnd will send V2 for
fixing this issue.
[10:53] [3.384408] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual
address 4afb0080
[10:53] [3.392755] Mem abort info:
[10:53] [3.395883] ESR = 0x96000144
[10
On Thu, Apr 13, 2023, at 14:13, Biju Das wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> FYI, this patch breaks on RZ/G2L SMARC EVK board and Arnd will send V2
> for fixing this issue.
>
> [10:53] [3.384408] Unable to handle kernel paging request at
> virtual address 4afb0080
Right, sorry about this, I accide
On Tue, Mar 28, 2023, at 00:25, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> +static inline void arch_dma_cache_wback(phys_addr_t paddr, size_t size)
>> {
>> +dma_cache_wback(paddr, size);
>> +}
>>
>> +static inline void arch_dma_cache_inv(phys_addr_t paddr, size_t size)
>> +{
>> +dma_cache_inv(paddr, si
On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 1:20 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> From: Arnd Bergmann
>
> Now that all of these have consistent behavior, replace them with
> a single shared implementation of arch_sync_dma_for_device() and
> arch_sync_dma_for_cpu() and three parameters to pick how they should
> operate:
>
> +static inline void arch_dma_cache_wback(phys_addr_t paddr, size_t size)
> {
> + dma_cache_wback(paddr, size);
> +}
>
> +static inline void arch_dma_cache_inv(phys_addr_t paddr, size_t size)
> +{
> + dma_cache_inv(paddr, size);
> }
> +static inline void arch_dma_cache_wback_inv(phys_
