On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 09:20 +, David Laight wrote:
> What are the sizes of the iommu table and the PE structure?
> If the table is a round number of pages then you probably don't want
> to embed it inside the PE structure.
The problem isn't the table itself but the struct iommu_table which
c
On 06/25/2014 07:20 PM, David Laight wrote:
> From: Wei Yang
>> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 02:12:34PM +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>>> On 06/25/2014 11:12 AM, Wei Yang wrote:
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 08:06:32PM +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> On 06/10/2014 11:56 AM, Wei Yang wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 09:20:11AM +, David Laight wrote:
>From: Wei Yang
>> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 02:12:34PM +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>> >On 06/25/2014 11:12 AM, Wei Yang wrote:
>> >> On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 08:06:32PM +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>> >>> On 06/10/2014 11:56 A
From: Wei Yang
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 02:12:34PM +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> >On 06/25/2014 11:12 AM, Wei Yang wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 08:06:32PM +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> >>> On 06/10/2014 11:56 AM, Wei Yang wrote:
> Current iommu_table of a PE is a static f
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 05:56:37PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 17:50 +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>
>> > Yes, iommu_talbe's life time equals to PE lifetime, so when releasing a PE
>> > we
>> > need to release the iommu table. Currently, there is one function t
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 05:50:08PM +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>On 06/25/2014 03:27 PM, Wei Yang wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 02:12:34PM +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>>> On 06/25/2014 11:12 AM, Wei Yang wrote:
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 08:06:32PM +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wro
On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 17:50 +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> > Yes, iommu_talbe's life time equals to PE lifetime, so when releasing a PE
> > we
> > need to release the iommu table. Currently, there is one function to release
> > the iommu table, iommu_free_table() which takes a pointer of th
On 06/25/2014 03:27 PM, Wei Yang wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 02:12:34PM +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>> On 06/25/2014 11:12 AM, Wei Yang wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 08:06:32PM +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
On 06/10/2014 11:56 AM, Wei Yang wrote:
> Current iommu_table
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 02:12:34PM +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>On 06/25/2014 11:12 AM, Wei Yang wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 08:06:32PM +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>>> On 06/10/2014 11:56 AM, Wei Yang wrote:
Current iommu_table of a PE is a static field. This will have a pr
On 06/25/2014 11:12 AM, Wei Yang wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 08:06:32PM +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>> On 06/10/2014 11:56 AM, Wei Yang wrote:
>>> Current iommu_table of a PE is a static field. This will have a problem when
>>> iommu_free_table is called.
>>
>> What kind of problem? Thi
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 08:06:32PM +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>On 06/10/2014 11:56 AM, Wei Yang wrote:
>> Current iommu_table of a PE is a static field. This will have a problem when
>> iommu_free_table is called.
>
>What kind of problem? This table is per PE and PE is not going anywhere.
>
On 06/10/2014 11:56 AM, Wei Yang wrote:
> Current iommu_table of a PE is a static field. This will have a problem when
> iommu_free_table is called.
What kind of problem? This table is per PE and PE is not going anywhere.
>
> This patch allocate iommu_table dynamically.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei
12 matches
Mail list logo
