Alex,
Thanks for responses all. This is a pure board-to-board setup. After
further investigation, it's pretty clear now that the issue is due to
my use of multiple ports ( See my other posting conveniently titled
"Support for multiple ports" :) ). Unfortunately, the freescale linux
patchset for
Bounine, Alexandre wrote:
In the current fsl_rio implementation initialization enables ACCEPT_ALL
mode for the port therefore you should not have problems caused by
initial destID value. Based on your post about multiport support I think
Btw, best is to use 0xFF (or 0x in 16-bit environment
Micha Nelissen wrote:
> Bounine, Alexandre wrote:
> > In the current fsl_rio implementation initialization enables
ACCEPT_ALL
> > mode for the port therefore you should not have problems caused by
> > initial destID value. Based on your post about multiport support I
think
> > you are close to fin
Bounine, Alexandre wrote:
In the current fsl_rio implementation initialization enables ACCEPT_ALL
mode for the port therefore you should not have problems caused by
initial destID value. Based on your post about multiport support I think
you are close to find a source of the problem.
Be aware t
Thomas Taranowski wrote:
> Yes, I tried pretty much all combinations of boot order, but I believe
> the preferred approach is to boot the agents first, then the host
> according to my freescale documentation. My problem was that all
> three devices had the same device id. Once I programmed them w
Yes, I tried pretty much all combinations of boot order, but I believe
the preferred approach is to boot the agents first, then the host
according to my freescale documentation. My problem was that all
three devices had the same device id. Once I programmed them with
different device id's via the
Thomas Taranowski wrote:
use my trusty jtag to issue a Port Link Maintenance Request and
request status, I get back unrecoverable ackID error for port 1, and
error-stopped port_status for port 2.
Did you try rebooting all devices together?
Micha
___
