RE: Xilinx EDK BSP generation of device trees for microblaze and PowerPC

2007-12-07 Thread Stephen Neuendorffer
n Loeliger > > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > > > linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org; Michal Simek; git > > > Subject: Re: Xilinx EDK BSP generation of device trees for > > > microblaze and PowerPC > > > > > > On 11/24/07, Stephen Neuendorffer > > >

RE: Xilinx EDK BSP generation of device trees for microblaze and PowerPC

2007-11-24 Thread Stephen Neuendorffer
Here's what I've gotten so far: Hard_Ethernet_MAC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] { #address-cells = <1>; #size-cells = <1>; [EMAIL PROTECTED] { compatible = "xlnx,xps-ll-temac-1.00.a", "xl

Re: Xilinx EDK BSP generation of device trees for microblaze and PowerPC

2007-11-25 Thread Grant Likely
On 11/24/07, Stephen Neuendorffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks for all this work; comments below. > > Here's what I've gotten so far: > > Hard_Ethernet_MAC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] { > #address-cells = <1>; > #size-cells = <1>; >

RE: Xilinx EDK BSP generation of device trees for microblaze and PowerPC

2007-11-26 Thread Stephen Neuendorffer
Stephen Neuendorffer; Segher Boessenkool; David Gibson; > Jon Loeliger > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org; Michal Simek; git > Subject: Re: Xilinx EDK BSP generation of device trees for > microblaze and PowerPC > > On 11/24/07, Stephen Neuendorffer > <[E

Re: Xilinx EDK BSP generation of device trees for microblaze and PowerPC

2007-12-02 Thread David Gibson
On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 03:47:12PM -0700, Grant Likely wrote: > On 11/24/07, Stephen Neuendorffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [snip] > > So: the mpmc generates a 'memory' node, corresponding to it's memory > > interface. It also gets a separate entry which contains the (optional, not > > present i

Re: Xilinx EDK BSP generation of device trees for microblaze and PowerPC

2007-12-02 Thread David Gibson
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 01:44:02PM -0800, Stephen Neuendorffer wrote: [snip] > > > reg = < 81c0 40 >; > > > > If these registers are addressable, then the parent needs a > > 'ranges' property. > > I thought ranges weren't necessary in a 1:1 mapping? You were

Re: Xilinx EDK BSP generation of device trees for microblaze and PowerPC

2007-12-02 Thread Grant Likely
t; > linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org; Michal Simek; git > > Subject: Re: Xilinx EDK BSP generation of device trees for > > microblaze and PowerPC > > > > On 11/24/07, Stephen Neuendorffer > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > Thanks for al