Re: [PATCH 26/60] microblaze_v4: time support

2008-06-27 Thread Michal Simek
>> + >> +static inline void udelay(unsigned long usec) >> +{ >> +} > >shouldnt this function be named zerodelay() ? > >Thanks, > tglx I have prepared implementation of this function which sent me JW. I did some changes which I test it because I found problem there. M _

Re: [PATCH 26/60] microblaze_v4: time support

2008-06-27 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > + > +static inline void udelay(unsigned long usec) > +{ > +} shouldnt this function be named zerodelay() ? Thanks, tglx ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/m