On 06/14/2016 04:59 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-06-14 at 16:17 +0530, Shreyas B Prabhu wrote:
>
>>
>> I ignored adding this check because this is part of initcall and we are
>> unlikely to run out of memory at this state. But I'll add the check in
>> next version.
>
> Why d
<1465404871-5406-11-git-send-email-shre...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
<1465854492.3022.30.ca...@au1.ibm.com>
<575fe64c.9080...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Organization: IBM Australia
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.20.3 (3.20.3-1.fc24)
Mime-Ve
On Tue, 2016-06-14 at 16:17 +0530, Shreyas B Prabhu wrote:
>
> I ignored adding this check because this is part of initcall and we are
> unlikely to run out of memory at this state. But I'll add the check in
> next version.
Why do you malloc the u64 array and not the string pointer array ?
Shoul
On 06/14/2016 03:18 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-06-08 at 11:54 -0500, Shreyas B. Prabhu wrote:
>>
>> /*
>> * States for dedicated partition case.
>> */
>> @@ -167,6 +183,8 @@ static int powernv_add_idle_states(void)
>> int nr_idle_states = 1; /* Snooze */
>> in
On 06/13/2016 09:04 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 11:54:30AM -0500, Shreyas B. Prabhu wrote:
>> POWER ISA v3 defines a new idle processor core mechanism. In summary,
>> a) new instruction named stop is added.
>> b) new per thread SPR named PSSCR is added which controls the
On Wed, 2016-06-08 at 11:54 -0500, Shreyas B. Prabhu wrote:
>
> /*
> * States for dedicated partition case.
> */
> @@ -167,6 +183,8 @@ static int powernv_add_idle_states(void)
> int nr_idle_states = 1; /* Snooze */
> int dt_idle_states;
> u32 *latency_ns, *residency_ns, *fla
On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 11:54:30AM -0500, Shreyas B. Prabhu wrote:
> POWER ISA v3 defines a new idle processor core mechanism. In summary,
> a) new instruction named stop is added.
> b) new per thread SPR named PSSCR is added which controls the behavior
> of stop instruction.
>
> Supported
