On 08/25/2016 03:46 PM, Balbir Singh wrote:
>
>
> On 25/08/16 01:06, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> On 08/24/2016 04:48 PM, Balbir Singh wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 25/08/16 00:44, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 08/19/2016 12:26 AM, Gautham R. Shenoy wrote:
> From: "Gautham R. Shenoy"
>
> Current
On 25/08/16 01:06, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 08/24/2016 04:48 PM, Balbir Singh wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 25/08/16 00:44, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>> On 08/19/2016 12:26 AM, Gautham R. Shenoy wrote:
From: "Gautham R. Shenoy"
Currently all the idle states registered by a cpu-idle driver are
On 08/24/2016 04:48 PM, Balbir Singh wrote:
>
>
> On 25/08/16 00:44, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> On 08/19/2016 12:26 AM, Gautham R. Shenoy wrote:
>>> From: "Gautham R. Shenoy"
>>>
>>> Currently all the idle states registered by a cpu-idle driver are
>>> enabled by default. This patch adds a mechani
On 25/08/16 00:44, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 08/19/2016 12:26 AM, Gautham R. Shenoy wrote:
>> From: "Gautham R. Shenoy"
>>
>> Currently all the idle states registered by a cpu-idle driver are
>> enabled by default. This patch adds a mechanism which allows the
>> driver to hint if an idle-state
On 08/19/2016 12:26 AM, Gautham R. Shenoy wrote:
> From: "Gautham R. Shenoy"
>
> Currently all the idle states registered by a cpu-idle driver are
> enabled by default. This patch adds a mechanism which allows the
> driver to hint if an idle-state should start in a disabled state. The
> cpu-idle