> On 29-Jul-2021, at 9:43 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 10:35:34AM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 01:31:06PM +0530, Sachin Sant wrote:
>>> next-20210723 was good. The boot failure seems to have been introduced with
>>> next-20210726.
>>>
>>>
On 7/29/2021 9:35 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 05:13:36PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 10:35:34AM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 01:31:06PM +0530, Sachin Sant wrote:
next-20210723 was good. The boot failure seems to
On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 05:13:36PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 10:35:34AM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 01:31:06PM +0530, Sachin Sant wrote:
> > > next-20210723 was good. The boot failure seems to have been introduced
> > > with next-20210726.
On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 10:35:34AM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 01:31:06PM +0530, Sachin Sant wrote:
> > next-20210723 was good. The boot failure seems to have been introduced with
> > next-20210726.
> >
> > I have attached the boot log.
>
> I noticed this with
> On 28-Jul-2021, at 11:05 PM, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 01:31:06PM +0530, Sachin Sant wrote:
>> linux-next fails to boot on Power server (POWER8/POWER9). Following traces
>> are seen during boot
>>
>> [0.010799] software IO TLB: tearing down default memory
Excerpts from Nathan Chancellor's message of July 29, 2021 3:35 am:
> On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 01:31:06PM +0530, Sachin Sant wrote:
>> linux-next fails to boot on Power server (POWER8/POWER9). Following traces
>> are seen during boot
>>
>> [0.010799] software IO TLB: tearing down default
On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 01:31:06PM +0530, Sachin Sant wrote:
> linux-next fails to boot on Power server (POWER8/POWER9). Following traces
> are seen during boot
>
> [0.010799] software IO TLB: tearing down default memory pool
> [0.010805] [ cut here ]
> [