On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 19:54 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> This really cracked me up. I have to ask what the sbc8560 was doing
> in the boot of your car?
The Land Rover was full.
--
dwmw2
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://oz
On 10/15/07, Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Guys,
>
> I was wondering if you cared about the following boards existing in
> arch/powerpc:
>
> * STX GP3
> * TQM 85xx
> * SBC 8560
>
> I'm told WR doesn't care about the SBC 8560, so I'll see if David does.
Sorry for the late reply, this just
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007, Kumar Gala wrote:
> On Oct 17, 2007, at 1:39 PM, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > On Mon, 2007-10-15 at 18:07 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> >> I was wondering if you cared about the following boards existing in
> >> arch/powerpc:
> >>
> >> * STX GP3
> >> * TQM 85xx
> >> * SBC 8560
> >>
On Oct 17, 2007, at 1:39 PM, David Woodhouse wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2007-10-15 at 18:07 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>> Guys,
>>
>> I was wondering if you cared about the following boards existing in
>> arch/powerpc:
>>
>> * STX GP3
>> * TQM 85xx
>> * SBC 8560
>>
>> I'm told WR doesn't care about the SBC
On Mon, 2007-10-15 at 18:07 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> Guys,
>
> I was wondering if you cared about the following boards existing in
> arch/powerpc:
>
> * STX GP3
> * TQM 85xx
> * SBC 8560
>
> I'm told WR doesn't care about the SBC 8560, so I'll see if David does.
Well, I found an sbc8560 in
On Tuesday 16 October 2007, Kumar Gala wrote:
> On Oct 16, 2007, at 12:28 AM, Stefan Roese wrote:
> > On Tuesday 16 October 2007, Kumar Gala wrote:
> I'm willing to look into doing the port over, but would need some
> help testing.
> >>>
> >>> Yes, it would be greatly appreciated if you c
Dear Kumar,
in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> >> 1. what processors does this actually support/run on. I'm guessing
> >> MPC8541, MPC8555? But not really sure
> >
> > IIRC there are 4 different versions of the board:
> > - 8540, 8541, 8555 & 8560
>
> do they all boot/run with the c
On Oct 16, 2007, at 12:28 AM, Stefan Roese wrote:
> On Tuesday 16 October 2007, Kumar Gala wrote:
I'm willing to look into doing the port over, but would need some
help testing.
>>>
>>> Yes, it would be greatly appreciated if you could start this
>>> TQM85xx port. I
>>> will of course d
On Tuesday 16 October 2007, Kumar Gala wrote:
> >> I'm willing to look into doing the port over, but would need some
> >> help testing.
> >
> > Yes, it would be greatly appreciated if you could start this
> > TQM85xx port. I
> > will of course do the testing.
>
> Ok, for the TQM85xx code in arch/pp
On Oct 15, 2007, at 7:07 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
> I was wondering if you cared about the following boards existing in
> arch/powerpc:
>
> * STX GP3
I have GP3 and GP3-SSA for testing.
If you can make a first pass at the changes
I'll debug and finish.
Thanks.
-- Dan
On Oct 15, 2007, at 11:40 PM, Stefan Roese wrote:
> Hi Kumar,
>
> On Tuesday 16 October 2007, Kumar Gala wrote:
>> I was wondering if you cared about the following boards existing in
>> arch/powerpc:
>>
>> * STX GP3
>> * TQM 85xx
>> * SBC 8560
>>
>> I'm told WR doesn't care about the SBC 8560, so
Hi Kumar,
On Tuesday 16 October 2007, Kumar Gala wrote:
> I was wondering if you cared about the following boards existing in
> arch/powerpc:
>
> * STX GP3
> * TQM 85xx
> * SBC 8560
>
> I'm told WR doesn't care about the SBC 8560, so I'll see if David does.
>
> I'm willing to look into doing the p
Dear Kumar,
in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> I was wondering if you cared about the following boards existing in
> arch/powerpc:
>
...
> * TQM 85xx
...
We definitely care about the TQM8xx{L,M,D}, TQM5200, TQM82xx, TQM834x,
TQM85xx and TQM86xx boards.
> I'm willing to look into d
Guys,
I was wondering if you cared about the following boards existing in
arch/powerpc:
* STX GP3
* TQM 85xx
* SBC 8560
I'm told WR doesn't care about the SBC 8560, so I'll see if David does.
I'm willing to look into doing the port over, but would need some
help testing.
- k
__
14 matches
Mail list logo
