On Thu, 2015-23-07 at 06:43:56 UTC, Ian Munsie wrote:
> From: Ian Munsie
>
> userspace programs using cxl currently have to use two strategies for
> dealing with MMIO errors simultaneously. They have to check every read
> for a return of all Fs in case the adapter has gone away and the kernel
> h
On Thu, 2015-07-23 at 16:43 +1000, Ian Munsie wrote:
> From: Ian Munsie
>
> userspace programs using cxl currently have to use two strategies for
> dealing with MMIO errors simultaneously. They have to check every read
> for a return of all Fs in case the adapter has gone away and the kernel
>
From: Ian Munsie
userspace programs using cxl currently have to use two strategies for
dealing with MMIO errors simultaneously. They have to check every read
for a return of all Fs in case the adapter has gone away and the kernel
has not yet noticed, and they have to deal with SIGBUS in case the
