On Sat, 2016-11-19 at 13:42:14 UTC, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> There are no ibmebus driver that make use of legacy suspend/resume. This
> patch removes the support for it from ibmebus framework, new ibmebus driver
> (as unlikely as they are) wanting to use suspend/resume should use
> dev_pm_ops.
>
Lars-Peter Clausen writes:
> On 11/21/2016 10:52 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> Lars-Peter Clausen writes:
>>
>>> There are no ibmebus driver that make use of legacy suspend/resume. This
>>> patch removes the support for it from ibmebus framework, new ibmebus driver
>>> (as unlikely as they are
On 11/21/2016 10:52 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Lars-Peter Clausen writes:
>
>> There are no ibmebus driver that make use of legacy suspend/resume. This
>> patch removes the support for it from ibmebus framework, new ibmebus driver
>> (as unlikely as they are) wanting to use suspend/resume shou
Lars-Peter Clausen writes:
> There are no ibmebus driver that make use of legacy suspend/resume. This
> patch removes the support for it from ibmebus framework, new ibmebus driver
> (as unlikely as they are) wanting to use suspend/resume should use
> dev_pm_ops.
>
> Since there aren't any special
There are no ibmebus driver that make use of legacy suspend/resume. This
patch removes the support for it from ibmebus framework, new ibmebus driver
(as unlikely as they are) wanting to use suspend/resume should use
dev_pm_ops.
Since there aren't any special bus specific things to do during
suspen
