On Thu, Nov 01, 2007 at 09:04:42AM -0500, Jon Loeliger wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 17:56, David Gibson wrote:
>
> > I'm not too keen on using a git feature that's more recent than the
> > git in most distros.
>
> I'm going to consider this argument null and void on two fronts:
>
> You don't u
On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 17:56, David Gibson wrote:
> I'm not too keen on using a git feature that's more recent than the
> git in most distros.
I'm going to consider this argument null and void on two fronts:
You don't use git for patch generation and submission anyway.
The Linux Community happil
On Thu, Nov 01, 2007 at 01:55:30AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> On Oct 30, 2007, at 6:40 PM, David Gibson wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 01:14:06PM -0400, Jerry Van Baren wrote:
> >> Jon Loeliger wrote:
> >>> So, like, the other day Kumar Gala mumbled:
> Jon,
>
> It seems lik
On Oct 30, 2007, at 6:40 PM, David Gibson wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 01:14:06PM -0400, Jerry Van Baren wrote:
>> Jon Loeliger wrote:
>>> So, like, the other day Kumar Gala mumbled:
Jon,
It seems like have libfdt as a unique git repo that is a
submodule of
the thin
David Gibson wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 01:14:06PM -0400, Jerry Van Baren wrote:
>> Jon Loeliger wrote:
>>> So, like, the other day Kumar Gala mumbled:
Jon,
It seems like have libfdt as a unique git repo that is a submodule of
the things that need it (dtc, u-boot, etc.)
Jon Loeliger wrote:
> So, like, the other day Kumar Gala mumbled:
>> Jon,
>>
>> It seems like have libfdt as a unique git repo that is a submodule of
>> the things that need it (dtc, u-boot, etc.) might make some sense and
>> it easier for the projects that need to pull it in.
>>
>> Is this som
On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 01:14:06PM -0400, Jerry Van Baren wrote:
> Jon Loeliger wrote:
>> So, like, the other day Kumar Gala mumbled:
>>> Jon,
>>>
>>> It seems like have libfdt as a unique git repo that is a submodule of
>>> the things that need it (dtc, u-boot, etc.) might make some sense and i
So, like, the other day Kumar Gala mumbled:
> Jon,
>
> It seems like have libfdt as a unique git repo that is a submodule of
> the things that need it (dtc, u-boot, etc.) might make some sense and
> it easier for the projects that need to pull it in.
>
> Is this something you can take a look
Jon,
It seems like have libfdt as a unique git repo that is a submodule of
the things that need it (dtc, u-boot, etc.) might make some sense and
it easier for the projects that need to pull it in.
Is this something you can take a look at? (or have other ideas on).
- k
___
