Re: libfreevec benchmarks

2008-09-02 Thread Ryan S. Arnold
Hi Konstantinos, I've been on vacation. Here are my responses. On Sun, 2008-08-24 at 11:03 +0300, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote: > Copyright assignment is not the issue, if there was interest in the first > place, that would never had deterred me. Okay. This does deter some people when they u

Re: libfreevec benchmarks

2008-08-24 Thread Konstantinos Margaritis
Στις Friday 22 August 2008 20:44:07 ο/η Ryan S. Arnold έγραψε: > Do you have FSF (Free Software Foundation) copyright assignment yet? Copyright assignment is not the issue, if there was interest in the first place, that would never had deterred me. > How've you implemented the optimizations? Sc

Re: libfreevec benchmarks

2008-08-22 Thread Ryan S. Arnold
On Fri, 2008-08-22 at 12:44 -0500, Ryan S. Arnold wrote: > Today, if glibc is configure with --with-cpu=970 it will actually > default to the power optimizations for the string routines, as > indicated > by the sysdeps/powerpc/powerpc[32|64]/970/Implies files. It'd be > worth > verifying that your

Re: libfreevec benchmarks

2008-08-22 Thread Ryan S. Arnold
On Thu, 2008-08-21 at 19:09 +0300, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote: > Benh suggested that I made this more known, and in particular to this list, > so > I send this mail in hope that some people might be interested. In particular, > I ran the following benchmarks against libfreevec/glibc: > > htt

libfreevec benchmarks

2008-08-21 Thread Konstantinos Margaritis
Benh suggested that I made this more known, and in particular to this list, so I send this mail in hope that some people might be interested. In particular, I ran the following benchmarks against libfreevec/glibc: http://www.freevec.org/content/libfreevec_104_benchmarks_updated libfreevec has r