On Thu, 2012-06-21 at 21:13 +0930, Alan Modra wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 08:18:39PM +0930, Alan Modra wrote:
> > Linker bug. That's not a sibling call, but a normal function return
> > via an out-of-line register restore function.
>
> I couldn't see how this might be occurring, then I remem
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 08:18:39PM +0930, Alan Modra wrote:
> Linker bug. That's not a sibling call, but a normal function return
> via an out-of-line register restore function.
I couldn't see how this might be occurring, then I remembered the
kernel has this horrible practise of using ld -r to p
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 05:38:27PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-06-21 at 17:07 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > On Thu, 2012-06-21 at 16:24 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2012-06-21 at 15:36 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > > >
> > > > powerpc64-linux-ld:
On Thu, 2012-06-21 at 17:07 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-06-21 at 16:24 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > On Thu, 2012-06-21 at 15:36 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > >
> > > powerpc64-linux-ld:
> > > /src/next/net/openvswitch/vport-netdev.c:189:(.text+0x89b990):
> > >
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 03:36:01PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 17:50 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> > allyesconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > powerpc64-linux-ld: arch/powerpc/net/built
On Thu, 2012-06-21 at 16:24 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-06-21 at 15:36 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> >
> > powerpc64-linux-ld:
> > /src/next/net/openvswitch/vport-netdev.c:189:(.text+0x89b990):
> > sibling call optimization to `_restgpr0_28' does not allow
> >
On Thu, 2012-06-21 at 15:36 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>
> powerpc64-linux-ld:
> /src/next/net/openvswitch/vport-netdev.c:189:(.text+0x89b990):
> sibling call optimization to `_restgpr0_28' does not allow automatic
> multiple TOCs;
> recompile with -mminimal-toc or -fno-opti
On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 17:50 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> allyesconfig) failed like this:
>
> powerpc64-linux-ld: arch/powerpc/net/built-in.o: In function
> `bpf_slow_path_word':
> (.text+0x90): sibling call optimiz
On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 17:50 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> allyesconfig) failed like this:
I hate our ABI is a good answer ? :-)
I'll see what I can do tomorrow. Poke me when I'm in the office.
Cheers,
Ben.
> power
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allyesconfig) failed like this:
powerpc64-linux-ld: arch/powerpc/net/built-in.o: In function
`bpf_slow_path_word':
(.text+0x90): sibling call optimization to `skb_copy_bits' does not allow
automatic multiple TOCs; recompile
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 1:25 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 09:32:14PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>> On Wed, 2011-12-28 at 19:49 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> > Hi ,
>> >
>> > After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
>> > allyesconfig) failed
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 09:32:14PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-12-28 at 19:49 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi ,
> >
> > After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> > allyesconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > kernel/built-in.o: In function `irq_dis
On Wed, 2011-12-28 at 19:49 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi ,
>
> After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> allyesconfig) failed like this:
>
> kernel/built-in.o: In function `irq_dispose_mapping':
> (.opd+0x159f0): multiple definition of `irq_dispose_mapping'
> arch/p
Hi ,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allyesconfig) failed like this:
kernel/built-in.o: In function `irq_dispose_mapping':
(.opd+0x159f0): multiple definition of `irq_dispose_mapping'
arch/powerpc/kernel/built-in.o:(.opd+0x960): first defined here
kernel/built-in.o
Hi Ben,
On Fri, 3 Sep 2010 13:24:10 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build
> (powerpc64 allnoconfig) failed like this:
>
> arch/powerpc/kernel/built-in.o: In function `.sys_call_table':
> (.text+0x8d48): undefined reference to `.compat_sys_recv'
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build
(powerpc64 allnoconfig) failed like this:
arch/powerpc/kernel/built-in.o: In function `.sys_call_table':
(.text+0x8d48): undefined reference to `.compat_sys_recv'
Caused by commit 86250b9d12caa1a3dee12a7cf638b7dd70eaadb6 ("powerpc: W
On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 17:19 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> ERROR: "of_i8042_kbd_irq" [drivers/input/serio/i8042.ko] undefined!
> ERROR: "of_i8042_aux_irq" [drivers/input/serio/i8042
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allmodconfig) failed like this:
ERROR: "of_i8042_kbd_irq" [drivers/input/serio/i8042.ko] undefined!
ERROR: "of_i8042_aux_irq" [drivers/input/serio/i8042.ko] undefined!
Presumably missing EXPORT_SYMBOLs ..
--
Cheers,
Stephen
18 matches
Mail list logo
