Linus Torvalds writes:
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 7:08 PM Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
>>
>> That patch works for me - for the ppc64_defconfig build at least.
>
> Yeah, I just tested the allmodconfig case too, although I suspect it's
> essentially the same wrt the boot *.S files, so it probably does
Linus Torvalds writes:
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 7:08 PM Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
>>
>> That patch works for me - for the ppc64_defconfig build at least.
>
> Yeah, I just tested the allmodconfig case too, although I suspect it's
> essentially the same wrt the boot *.S files, so it probably does
Hi all,
On Tue, 14 Sep 2021 12:08:18 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> That patch works for me - for the ppc64_defconfig build at least.
also allnoconfig, 64bit allnoconfig, pseries_le_defconfig and ppc44x_defconfig
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
pgpJX7oVVSmfh.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital s
On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 7:08 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> That patch works for me - for the ppc64_defconfig build at least.
Yeah, I just tested the allmodconfig case too, although I suspect it's
essentially the same wrt the boot *.S files, so it probably doesn't
matter.
I'd like to have Michae
Hi Linus,
On Mon, 13 Sep 2021 18:29:26 -0700 Linus Torvalds
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 5:58 PM Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
> >
> > > I have no idea why it then complains about removal of the GCC4 macros.
> >
> > Me neither :-(
>
> Ooh.
>
> So I'm looking at gcc sources, just to see if
On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 6:37 PM Linus Torvalds
wrote:
>
> Anyway, that just makes me think that something like that patch in my
> previous email is the way to go, but I would like to stress (again)
> how little testing it had: exactly none.
>
> So please consider that nothing more than a hand-wavy
On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 6:29 PM Linus Torvalds
wrote:
>
> Now, do I know *why* that ppc Makefile it does that? No.
Well, that is simple enough to find out..
git show 77433830ed164
just tells us.
Of course, that also points to scripts/Makefile.lib, which doesn't
have this problem, becau
On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 5:58 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> > I have no idea why it then complains about removal of the GCC4 macros.
>
> Me neither :-(
Ooh.
So I'm looking at gcc sources, just to see if "maybe this thing is
somehow conditional".
And bingo.
In cpp_init_special_builtins(), gcc d
Hi Linus,
On Mon, 13 Sep 2021 17:24:11 -0700 Linus Torvalds
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 5:19 PM Linus Torvalds
> wrote:
> >
> > What version of gcc is this? Are you maybe on gcc-4.9 and we just
> > didn't check that properly?
>
> Hmm. That version check works for me (tested by just ar
On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 5:19 PM Linus Torvalds
wrote:
>
> What version of gcc is this? Are you maybe on gcc-4.9 and we just
> didn't check that properly?
Hmm. That version check works for me (tested by just arbitrarily
making min-tool-version return version 15 for gcc ;)
So you got far enough th
On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 5:09 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> gcc -Wp,-MD,arch/powerpc/boot/.crt0.o.d
Ok, so it's not the funky "clang reports gcc-4" that caused tool breakage.
What version of gcc is this? Are you maybe on gcc-4.9 and we just
didn't check that properly?
Linus
Hi all,
After merging the origin tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
In file included from :
include/linux/compiler_attributes.h:62:5: warning: "__has_attribute" is not
defined, evaluates to 0 [-Wundef]
62 | #if __has_attribute(__assume_aligned__)
Hi,
On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 08:52:21 +0900 Yasuaki Ishimatsu
wrote:
>
> 2012/10/10 8:45, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:21:50 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Linus,
> >>
> >> In Linus' tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc ppc64_defconfig) failed
> >> like this:
>
Hi Andrew,
On Tue, 9 Oct 2012 16:45:14 -0700 Andrew Morton
wrote:
>
> On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:21:50 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
>
> > I can't see what the point of the "pfn" variable is
>
> This:
>
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c~a
> +++ a/arch/powerpc/platforms/p
Hi Stephen,
2012/10/10 8:45, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:21:50 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
Hi Linus,
In Linus' tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc ppc64_defconfig) failed
like this:
arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c: In function
'pseries_remove_memblock
On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:21:50 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
> Hi Linus,
>
> In Linus' tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc ppc64_defconfig) failed
> like this:
>
> arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c: In function
> 'pseries_remove_memblock':
> arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotp
Hi Linus,
In Linus' tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc ppc64_defconfig) failed
like this:
arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c: In function
'pseries_remove_memblock':
arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c:103:17: error: unused variable
'pfn' [-Werror=unused-variable]
17 matches
Mail list logo