Re: mpc512x uart: testers wanted

2010-05-02 Thread Grant Likely
On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 5:24 AM, Albrecht Dreß wrote: > Hi Grant: > > Am 27.04.10 20:28 schrieb(en) Albrecht Dreß: >>> >>> MPC5121e Hardware Design Guide provides correct info according to my >>> tests using /16 and /10 prescaler. I've send a new patch with the fixed >>> comments, unfortunately f

Re: mpc512x uart: testers wanted

2010-05-02 Thread Albrecht Dreß
Hi Grant: Am 27.04.10 20:28 schrieb(en) Albrecht Dreß: MPC5121e Hardware Design Guide provides correct info according to my tests using /16 and /10 prescaler. I've send a new patch with the fixed comments, unfortunately forgot to mark it as v4, but it is threaded to your v.3a patch and conta

Re: mpc512x uart: testers wanted

2010-03-27 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Albrecht =?iso-8859-1?b?RHJl3w==?=, In message <1269696561.224...@antares> you wrote: > > > Thanks for the reminder - I sent Anatolij the rebased patch off-list (as I > didn't want to clutter the list again with the same patch) 2½ weeks ago, > but didn't get any testing results from him yet.

Re: mpc512x uart: testers wanted

2010-03-27 Thread Grant Likely
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 7:29 AM, Albrecht Dreß wrote: > Dear Grant: > > Am 27.03.10 03:10 schrieb(en) Grant Likely: >> >> Ping?  I was looking at this tonight but it of course doesn't apply. Have >> you gotten a chance to rebase this patch yet? > > Thanks for the reminder - I sent Anatolij the r

Re: mpc512x uart: testers wanted

2010-03-27 Thread Albrecht Dreß
Dear Grant: Am 27.03.10 03:10 schrieb(en) Grant Likely: Ping? I was looking at this tonight but it of course doesn't apply. Have you gotten a chance to rebase this patch yet? Thanks for the reminder - I sent Anatolij the rebased patch off-list (as I didn't want to clutter the list again wit

Re: mpc512x uart: testers wanted

2010-03-26 Thread Grant Likely
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Grant Likely wrote: > On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 9:32 AM, Albrecht Dreß wrote: >> Hi Anatolij: >> >>> > Anatolij, could you please look into this? >>> >>> I'll look into this tomorrow, need to finish USB support now. >>> Unfortunately the patch doesn't apply on top of

Re: mpc512x uart: testers wanted

2010-03-08 Thread Grant Likely
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 9:32 AM, Albrecht Dreß wrote: > Hi Anatolij: > >> > Anatolij, could you please look into this? >> >> I'll look into this tomorrow, need to finish USB support now. >> Unfortunately the patch doesn't apply on top of Linus' tree as >> patches for reworked MPC5121 PSC UART supp

Re: mpc512x uart: testers wanted

2010-03-08 Thread Albrecht Dre�
Hi Anatolij: > > Anatolij, could you please look into this? > > I'll look into this tomorrow, need to finish USB support now. > Unfortunately the patch doesn't apply on top of Linus' tree as > patches for reworked MPC5121 PSC UART support have been merged. > Albrecht, could you please rebase your

Re: mpc512x uart: testers wanted

2010-03-08 Thread Anatolij Gustschin
Hi Grant, Albrecht, On Sun, 7 Mar 2010 17:45:23 -0700 Grant Likely wrote: > Anatolij, could you please look into this? I'll look into this tomorrow, need to finish USB support now. Unfortunately the patch doesn't apply on top of Linus' tree as patches for reworked MPC5121 PSC UART support have

Re: mpc512x uart: testers wanted

2010-03-07 Thread Grant Likely
Anatolij, could you please look into this? Thanks, g. On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 9:15 AM, Albrecht Dreß wrote: > Hi all, > > I recently posted a patch which improves the baud rate calculation on the > mpc5200b.  Following requests by Grant and Wolfram, I added changes which do > also affect the mp

mpc512x uart: testers wanted

2010-03-07 Thread Albrecht Dreß
Hi all, I recently posted a patch which improves the baud rate calculation on the mpc5200b. Following requests by Grant and Wolfram, I added changes which do also affect the mpc512x. Unfortunately, I don't have access to such a system, but IMHO the code (both the old implementation and my ch