hank peng wrote:
I remember normal memory copy can also be done (chosen by user) by DMA
engine on IOP80331(Intel embedded cpu, xscale arch), so why ppc
platform didn't make use of DMA doing memory copy, I think it can
increase performance, please correct me if I am wrong!
AFAIK the DMA engine
2009/11/3 Micha Nelissen mi...@neli.hopto.org:
hank peng wrote:
I remember normal memory copy can also be done (chosen by user) by DMA
engine on IOP80331(Intel embedded cpu, xscale arch), so why ppc
platform didn't make use of DMA doing memory copy, I think it can
increase performance,
On Nov 3, 2009, at 8:38 AM, hank peng wrote:
2009/11/3 Micha Nelissen mi...@neli.hopto.org:
hank peng wrote:
I remember normal memory copy can also be done (chosen by user) by
DMA
engine on IOP80331(Intel embedded cpu, xscale arch), so why ppc
platform didn't make use of DMA doing memory
Kernel version is 2.6.30 and I have enabled fsl DMA engine during
configuring kernel. After system booted, I have seen only 38 DMA
interrupts, and no increase later when I am doing data transfer
through network.
So I wonder if mpc8548 had made use of DMA engine when doing memcpy,
or maybe if
On Nov 2, 2009, at 9:40 AM, hank peng wrote:
Kernel version is 2.6.30 and I have enabled fsl DMA engine during
configuring kernel. After system booted, I have seen only 38 DMA
interrupts, and no increase later when I am doing data transfer
through network.
So I wonder if mpc8548 had made use
2009/11/3 Kumar Gala ga...@kernel.crashing.org:
On Nov 2, 2009, at 9:40 AM, hank peng wrote:
Kernel version is 2.6.30 and I have enabled fsl DMA engine during
configuring kernel. After system booted, I have seen only 38 DMA
interrupts, and no increase later when I am doing data transfer
