On Mon, 2016-04-07 at 04:51:44 UTC, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On some environments (prototype machines, some simulators, etc...)
> there is no functional interrupt source to signal completion, so
> we rely on the fairly slow OPAL heartbeat.
>
> In a number of cases, the calls complete very
On Mon, 2016-07-04 at 14:51 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On some environments (prototype machines, some simulators, etc...)
> there is no functional interrupt source to signal completion, so
> we rely on the fairly slow OPAL heartbeat.
>
> In a number of cases, the calls complete very
On Mon, 2016-07-04 at 16:11 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-04-07 at 04:51:44 UTC, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > On some environments (prototype machines, some simulators, etc...)
> > there is no functional interrupt source to signal completion, so
> > we rely on the fairly slow
On Mon, 2016-04-07 at 04:51:44 UTC, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On some environments (prototype machines, some simulators, etc...)
> there is no functional interrupt source to signal completion, so
> we rely on the fairly slow OPAL heartbeat.
>
> In a number of cases, the calls complete very
On some environments (prototype machines, some simulators, etc...)
there is no functional interrupt source to signal completion, so
we rely on the fairly slow OPAL heartbeat.
In a number of cases, the calls complete very quickly or even
immediately. We've observed that it helps a lot to wakeup
