On Tue, 2011-11-01 at 08:32 +0530, Santosh Kumar wrote:
I am using the same compiler as 476 440 instruction is almost the same.
Well the 476 implements ISA 2.05, which I think has added a fair amount
over the 440. Not to mention the 476 core that has been released has
a FP unit. I'll note
The relevant options are -mcpu=476 (no FP unit) and -mcpu=476fp (with FP
unit). Basically, -mcpu=476 is equivalent to -mcpu=476fp -msoft-float.
Yes what you have mentioned is right.
I had a problem configuring the GCC for 476 in little endian mode,
therefore I am using 440 compiler. As this
On Tue, 2011-11-01 at 22:44 +0530, Santosh Kumar wrote:
I had a problem configuring the GCC for 476 in little endian mode,
What type of problem? I assume the binutils you are building
against has 476 support too, correct? You'll need that.
So is this PTE fault related to the compiler
I have built a cross compiler for ppc440 in little endian mode and
using it to build the kernel.
Yes i am running Linux in Little-Endian. This is the first user space
process. I wrote the below program and running it as init from
/sbin/init. I have also set the permissions with chmod +s.
On Mon, 2011-10-31 at 20:49 +1100, Michael Neuling wrote:
I have built a cross compiler for ppc440 in little endian mode and
using it to build the kernel.
Yes i am running Linux in Little-Endian. This is the first user space
process. I wrote the below program and running it as init from
This is not the first user-space instruction. While executing this
process kernel has added two TLB entries with TID(process id) 1. while
trying to map 0x10fc it is raising pte faults .
Santosh Kumar .A
Vision without Action is a daydream... Action without Vision is a nightmare...
On 31
Adding linuxppc-dev list to the CC
KERNEL: linux 2.6.39.4
POWERPC: 476, little endian.
I am trying to get linux 2.6.39.4 up on PPC 476 i have done done
Big-endian to little endian Changes in:
Can you explain what you are trying to do in more detail? What does i
have done Big-endian to
