On Wed 19-02-14 08:33:45, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
On 19.02.2014 [08:24:38 -0800], Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
On 18.02.2014 [17:43:38 -0800], David Rientjes wrote:
On Tue, 18 Feb 2014, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
How about the following?
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c
On Tue 18-02-14 14:27:11, David Rientjes wrote:
On Tue, 18 Feb 2014, Michal Hocko wrote:
Hi,
I have just noticed that ppc has RECLAIM_DISTANCE reduced to 10 set by
56608209d34b (powerpc/numa: Set a smaller value for RECLAIM_DISTANCE to
enable zone reclaim). The commit message suggests
On Tue 18-02-14 15:34:05, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
Hi Michal,
On 18.02.2014 [10:06:58 +0100], Michal Hocko wrote:
Hi,
I have just noticed that ppc has RECLAIM_DISTANCE reduced to 10 set by
56608209d34b (powerpc/numa: Set a smaller value for RECLAIM_DISTANCE to
enable zone reclaim).
On Tue 18-02-14 17:43:38, David Rientjes wrote:
On Tue, 18 Feb 2014, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
How about the following?
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index 5de4337..1a0eced 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -1854,7 +1854,8 @@ static void
On Wed 19-02-14 00:20:21, David Rientjes wrote:
On Wed, 19 Feb 2014, Michal Hocko wrote:
I strongly suspect that the patch is correct since powerpc node distances
are different than the architectures you're talking about and get doubled
for every NUMA domain that the hardware
On 19.02.2014 [08:24:38 -0800], Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
On 18.02.2014 [17:43:38 -0800], David Rientjes wrote:
On Tue, 18 Feb 2014, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
How about the following?
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index 5de4337..1a0eced 100644
---
On 18.02.2014 [17:43:38 -0800], David Rientjes wrote:
On Tue, 18 Feb 2014, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
How about the following?
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index 5de4337..1a0eced 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -1854,7 +1854,8 @@ static
On 19.02.2014 [09:23:13 +0100], Michal Hocko wrote:
On Tue 18-02-14 15:34:05, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
Hi Michal,
On 18.02.2014 [10:06:58 +0100], Michal Hocko wrote:
Hi,
I have just noticed that ppc has RECLAIM_DISTANCE reduced to 10 set by
56608209d34b (powerpc/numa: Set a
Hi,
I have just noticed that ppc has RECLAIM_DISTANCE reduced to 10 set by
56608209d34b (powerpc/numa: Set a smaller value for RECLAIM_DISTANCE to
enable zone reclaim). The commit message suggests that the zone reclaim
is desirable for all NUMA configurations.
History has shown that the zone
Hi Michal,
On 18.02.2014 [10:06:58 +0100], Michal Hocko wrote:
Hi,
I have just noticed that ppc has RECLAIM_DISTANCE reduced to 10 set by
56608209d34b (powerpc/numa: Set a smaller value for RECLAIM_DISTANCE to
enable zone reclaim). The commit message suggests that the zone reclaim
is
On 18.02.2014 [15:34:05 -0800], Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
Hi Michal,
On 18.02.2014 [10:06:58 +0100], Michal Hocko wrote:
Hi,
I have just noticed that ppc has RECLAIM_DISTANCE reduced to 10 set by
56608209d34b (powerpc/numa: Set a smaller value for RECLAIM_DISTANCE to
enable zone
On 18.02.2014 [15:58:00 -0800], Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
On 18.02.2014 [15:34:05 -0800], Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
Hi Michal,
On 18.02.2014 [10:06:58 +0100], Michal Hocko wrote:
Hi,
I have just noticed that ppc has RECLAIM_DISTANCE reduced to 10 set by
56608209d34b
12 matches
Mail list logo