NVRAM/RTC

2002-12-13 Thread Aman
Hi Matt This might be a very basic question. By porting what do you mean?. As of now I copied the ebony bsp to different location and did changes to boot on the custom board. Till now it was booting without any problem. Once I changed the EBC configuration to configure some other FPGA ,bcos of wh

mcc support on mpc8260

2002-12-13 Thread Omanakuttan
Ing.Gianfranco Morandi wrote: > I have promised to Pete of releasing some code for such driver. We will > provide to perform such task during the next days. Thank you very much for this information. Since I will be working on that, I will also be glad to contribute something to your activities. >

823 Video Controller Driver - where ?

2002-12-13 Thread Wolfgang Grandegger
On 12/13/2002 05:07 PM Steve Rossi wrote: > I've seen some reference on the list regarding a driver for the 823 > Video Controller - > i.e. > http://lists.linuxppc.org/results.html?restrict=linuxppc-embedded&words=vid823 > however I've been unable to locate the source to vid823.c > apparently this

823 Video Controller Driver - where ?

2002-12-13 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Steve, in message <3DFA05C3.30703 at ccrl.mot.com> you wrote: > > I've seen some reference on the list regarding a driver for the 823 > Video Controller - > i.e. > http://lists.linuxppc.org/results.html?restrict=linuxppc-embedded&words=vid823 > however I've been unable to locate the source t

mcc support on mpc8260

2002-12-13 Thread Ing.Gianfranco Morandi
I mean that by using the revision A.1 You could have some troubles. Main reason is related to the Global Underrun (GUN) that often occours when many channels are active (we use continuosly 64 channels on one mcc). This issue has been repored by Motorola in its document "mpc8260cesumm.pdf" and fina

DMA question for ppc440 PCI board

2002-12-13 Thread Khai Trinh
Hi folks, Does anyone out there work on 440 based PCI board? I have a DMA problem with the 440 DMA controller. In our application, the 440 based PCI board is living in a Solaris host platform. Our PCI board is running with linux version 2.4.17. So, there are Host software, driver and embedded li

Support for Arctic platform (405LP based)

2002-12-13 Thread David Gibson
The patch below adds support for IBM's Arctic-II development system, based on the 405LP processor. For now this is just the core support, more drivers coming soon. Are there any objections, or suggestions for doing things better before I commit this to linuxppc_2_4_devel? In particular, I'd wel

"Segmentation fault"message

2002-12-13 Thread yamazaki
hi. we made custom board(cpu is MPC8245) kernel is 2.4.18 our application sometimes stop with the message "Segmentation fault"or "illegal instruction". So i searched this message on kernel source code by grep command. But i could not find this message "Segmentation fault". somebody tell me where i

Support for Arctic platform (405LP based)

2002-12-13 Thread Todd Poynor
A few comments and questions... I assume symbol CONFIG_ARCTIC2 is more appropriate than CONFIG_ARCTIC, with additional symbols possibly to be invented in the future to distinguish minor changes in board rev 3, 4, ... But mentioning this just in case it might make future maintenance easier to use

Compiling ucd-snmp using ELDK for PPC

2002-12-13 Thread Jin Cheng
Hi, Anybody succeeded in compiling ucd-snmp.4.2.6 using ELDK? Could you please share your option run with configure? I have compiled one, but only can snmpget/snmpwalk/etc, but can not snmpset, it always returns timeout. Thanks Jin ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists

mcc support on mpc8260

2002-12-13 Thread Ing.Gianfranco Morandi
I have promised to Pete of releasing some code for such driver. We will provide to perform such task during the next days. Actually we are writing some documents to better describe the driver and how to lock it to the kernel tree. We will inform the community when the driver will be available. A

NVRAM/RTC

2002-12-13 Thread Matt Porter
On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 09:35:22PM +0530, Aman wrote: > This might be a very basic question. By porting what do you mean?. As of now By "porting", I mean adding a set of code that reflect the unique characteristics of your custom board. > I copied the ebony bsp to different location and did chan

Move 405LP RTC support from beech.c into ibm405lp.c

2002-12-13 Thread David Gibson
On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 10:17:44AM -0600, Hollis Blanchard wrote: > On Wed, 2002-12-11 at 21:54, David Gibson wrote: > > > > The RTC support (written by Todd Poynor) for the Beech is actually in > > the 405LP chip itself, not just on the Beech board. > > > As a separate patch (either before or af

823 Video Controller Driver - where ?

2002-12-13 Thread Steve Rossi
I've seen some reference on the list regarding a driver for the 823 Video Controller - i.e. http://lists.linuxppc.org/results.html?restrict=linuxppc-embedded&words=vid823 however I've been unable to locate the source to vid823.c apparently this question was asked before: http://lists.linuxppc.org/

Support for Arctic platform (405LP based)

2002-12-13 Thread Tom Rini
On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 08:16:43AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote: [snip] > If you aren't already on the linuxppc-commit at source.mvista.com list, you > might want to join that. And since this is at a possibly non obvious location: http://source.mvista.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-commit Hopef

Support for Arctic platform (405LP based)

2002-12-13 Thread Matt Porter
On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 08:18:08AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 09:51:26PM -0700, Cort Dougan wrote: > > > Would you be able to commit them to _2_4 instead so they're not in the > > wildly divergent _2_4_devel tree? That would definitely be handy when > > trying to find wher

Support for Arctic platform (405LP based)

2002-12-13 Thread Tom Rini
On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 09:51:26PM -0700, Cort Dougan wrote: > Would you be able to commit them to _2_4 instead so they're not in the > wildly divergent _2_4_devel tree? That would definitely be handy when > trying to find where the working trees are. One of my goals for winter break is to try

Support for Arctic platform (405LP based)

2002-12-13 Thread Tom Rini
On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 07:26:02AM -0700, Gary Thomas wrote: > On Thu, 2002-12-12 at 21:51, Cort Dougan wrote: > > > > Would you be able to commit them to _2_4 instead so they're not in the > > wildly divergent _2_4_devel tree? That would definitely be handy when > > trying to find where the wor

Support for Arctic platform (405LP based)

2002-12-13 Thread Gary Thomas
On Thu, 2002-12-12 at 21:51, Cort Dougan wrote: > > Would you be able to commit them to _2_4 instead so they're not in the > wildly divergent _2_4_devel tree? That would definitely be handy when > trying to find where the working trees are. > > } The patch below adds support for IBM's Arctic-II d

mcc support on mpc8260

2002-12-13 Thread Allen Curtis
> Be aware do not use the mcc with the silicon revision older than B.1. Could you provide more information on this comment. There are lots of reasons not to use a rev A.1 chip. This is the first time that I heard about using too new of a chip. THX ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. S