In message <20041014181059.21986.qmail at web53803.mail.yahoo.com> you wrote:
> Thanks again. I am glad to be back on the mailing
> lists. And yes, forgot to say hi to Wolfgang Denk,
> another one of my mentors. Hey Denk.
Hello!
> And what's the story on lists.linuxppc.org. Will they
> ever retri
On Thu, Oct 14, 2004 at 09:44:30AM -0700, Rupesh S wrote:
>
> volatile __u32* __fpga;
>
> __fpga = (__u32*) ioremap_nocache(0x6000, (4*1024));
>
> /* writel(data, ((__u32)__fpga + 0x0C)); */ /* This does not work */
>
> *(vola
On Fri, 15 Oct 2004, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 14, 2004 at 04:53:49PM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> >
> > > Is it not time to merge 8xx from linuxppc-2.5 into Linus tree?
> > >
> > > I know the 8xx is not fully functional yet but this isn't done
> > > soon I think it won't happen
Marius Groeger wrote?
> From what I know, the term BSP was coined as an
> acronym for "Board Support Package" in pre-Linux
> days. To me it is most familiar in
So that day the meaning of BSP was clear enough.
> "LSP" is a term introduced by MontaVista, AFAIR, so
> maybe one of the MV folks on
Is it not time to merge 8xx from linuxppc-2.5 into Linus tree?
I know the 8xx is not fully functional yet but this isn't done
soon I think it won't happen at all. The 8xx arch can be made to
depend on BROKEN in Linus tree to make it clear that it isn't
working properly yet.
Jocke
On Thu, Oct 14, 2004 at 06:25:54PM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Oct 2004, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
>
> > > On Thu, Oct 14, 2004 at 04:53:49PM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > >
> > > > Is it not time to merge 8xx from linuxppc-2.5 into Linus tree?
> > > >
> > > > I know the 8xx is
On Thu, Oct 14, 2004 at 04:53:49PM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> Is it not time to merge 8xx from linuxppc-2.5 into Linus tree?
>
> I know the 8xx is not fully functional yet but this isn't done
> soon I think it won't happen at all. The 8xx arch can be made to
> depend on BROKEN in Linus tre
On Oct 14, 2004, at 11:53 AM, annamaya wrote:
> I cant believe I was stupid enough to beleive that the
> user's manual of an eval board was giving me the
> correct information.
Well, you have to start somewhere. Good job
debugging, you get major points for that! :-)
-- Dan
Hi,
> Have you turned on emulation of FP in the kernel?
No I did not it, but with the FP emulation on, the Linux runs...
Many thanks for your help.
> > The console is mapped on SCC1 port.
> > CCSRBAR is mapped at 0xF800 and immr at 0xF808.
> I would suggest using the standard memory map
Thanks again. I am glad to be back on the mailing
lists. And yes, forgot to say hi to Wolfgang Denk,
another one of my mentors. Hey Denk.
And what's the story on lists.linuxppc.org. Will they
ever retrieve the archives?
--- Dan Malek wrote:
>
> On Oct 14, 2004, at 11:53 AM, annamaya wrote:
>
On Thu, 2004-10-14 at 04:49, Laurent Lagrange wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> > Have you turned on emulation of FP in the kernel?
> No I did not it, but with the FP emulation on, the Linux runs...
> Many thanks for your help.
Excellent!
> > > The console is mapped on SCC1 port.
> > > CCSRBAR is mapped at 0x
On Wed, 2004-10-13 at 22:13, Kumar Gala wrote:
> Have you turned on emulation of FP in the kernel?
>
> - kumar
>
> On Oct 13, 2004, at 4:01 PM, Dan Malek wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Oct 13, 2004, at 1:07 PM, Laurent Lagrange wrote:
> >
> > > The console is mapped on SCC1 port.
> > > CCSRBAR is mapp
On Thu, 14 Oct 2004, Sam Song wrote:
> I'd like to make sure about the meaning of BSP and
> LSP. There is sth unclear in my mind, I am afraid.
>From what I know, the term BSP was coined as an acronym for "Board
Support Package" in pre-Linux days. To me it is most familiar in
conjunction with Em
Thanks for the informations.
I used "ioremap" and it works !!
However, when I checked out some documentaions on this regard, I
happened to notice that for "cache disabled acees in some arch", we
would probably need to use "ioremap_nocache". My requirement is for a
cache disabled access. Also, I re
I cant believe I was stupid enough to beleive that the
user's manual of an eval board was giving me the
correct information.
The problem turned out to be that the FCC controllers
were not assigned to the ports that the manual stated.
They were switched. I was configuring the wrong FCC
controllers
Wolfgang Denk wrote?
> Don't worry. These terms are not clearly defined at
> all.
It turned to be like this. No wonder I didn't make it
clear.:-)
> My recommendation: don't care about these terms.
OK, after taking your explanation, I wouldn't be
confused by a salesman at least.
Thanks very muc
Hi all,
I'd like to make sure about the meaning of BSP and
LSP. There is sth unclear in my mind, I am afraid.
IMHO, BSP includes Board's Hardware Scheme and Boot
Loader Code in Binary format or Source code. LSP
should be composed of Development Kit like ELDK and
Linux Kernel Source for special Bo
17 matches
Mail list logo
