Hi David,
>>>Look in mm/mmap.c and search for overcommit_memory, then do same
>>>in the sources for your redhat kernels.
>>I'll look into RH kernel to see if it isn't like you say :-)
>>>Perhaps there's a patch for it floating around somewhere? ;-)
>>Now, that would be really nice.
>>Though I have
tended recipient/s and may contain material that is CONFIDENTIAL AND
PRIVATE COMPANY INFORMATION. Any review or reliance by others or copying or
distribution or forwarding of any or all of the contents in this message is
STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact
the sender by email and delete all copies; your cooperation in this regard
is appreciated.
**
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-embedded/attachments/20050331/cdedc379/attachment.htm
canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :
http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-embedded/attachments/20050331/8e26a16f/attachment.pgp
Has anyone built an image for the Memec 1152 V2P board? I downloaded
the linuxppc bitkeeper, but it seems to want to build an i386 version.
Havent figured out a config that gets me a useableimage.Can anyone send
me a config file that compiles?
Thanks
Tracey
On Thu, 2005-03-31 at 13:10 -0700, Matt wrote:
>
> If nobody has time to work on this, then I intend to put Wade's 440EP
> support in as is (actually, he's planning on resubmitting with some
> additional changes). When somebody has time, they can redo the patch
> against that.
Do those changes
I'll try to see if I can build a kernel to use on a pegasos box to test
out the avec side tomorrow.
- kumar
On Mar 31, 2005, at 2:15 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 01:10:44PM -0700, Matt wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 09:34:21AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 31,
Signed-off-by: Dale Farnsworth
Index: linux-2.5-usb-405/arch/ppc/platforms/4xx/ibmstb4.c
===
--- linux-2.5-usb-405.orig/arch/ppc/platforms/4xx/ibmstb4.c
+++ linux-2.5-usb-405/arch/ppc/platforms/4xx/ibmstb4.c
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
#inc
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 01:08:07PM -0800, Eugene Surovegin wrote:
> Dale, please, don't mess with UIC registers directly, there is a
> cleaner way to set this up.
>
> Take a look at how this is done in other 4xx ports
> (ppc4xx_core_uic_cfg & ppc4xx_uic_ext_irq_cfg).
Thanks for the heads up Eug
Good point.
There is also IMMR need to be passed from bootloader to kernel. We can make
more use of the u-boot bd_info mechanism. But it binds ppc linux to u-boot
boot loader. I don't know if we should make it a porting convention.
Best Regards,
Leo
> -Original Message-
> From: Eugen
Desc: not available
Url :
http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-embedded/attachments/20050331/31718842/attachment.bin
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: cpm-timer.lindent.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 7152 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :
http
Hi,
Are there any criteria to define things on so many different header
files for 440 family chips? For example, an Ocotea board has the
following header files.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
I can understand the reasons why there are ibm44x.h, ibm440gx.h, and
ocotea.h. But why do we need to separate ibm44
: text/x-patch
Size: 4739 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :
http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-embedded/attachments/20050331/399f76d1/attachment.bin
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: cpm-timer.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 16394 bytes
Desc: not
This structure allows for callbacks into platform-specific code when the
driver is started or stopped. This file is currently included by
drivers/usb/host/ohci-ppc-soc.c, so it's needed for USB on the stb04xxx,
mpc52xx, and 440EP.
Signed-off-by: Dale Farnsworth
Index: linux-2.5-usb-405/include/
Signed-off-by: Dale Farnsworth
Index: linux-2.5-usb-405/arch/ppc/platforms/4xx/ibmstb4.c
===
--- linux-2.5-usb-405.orig/arch/ppc/platforms/4xx/ibmstb4.c
+++ linux-2.5-usb-405/arch/ppc/platforms/4xx/ibmstb4.c
@@ -72,12 +72,43 @@
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
I hope Wolfgang doesn't mind me forwarding this :-) This is what I have
some limited time for at the moment - but work takes priority!
Cheers,
Jon.
- Original Message
Subject: bi_recs and u-boot ppcboot.h
Date: Fri, 11 Mar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kumar Gala wrote:
|> My intention was to give a device tree structure to the kernel at boot
|> time via a (pseudo?) pointer in bd_info or similar. Then you would only
|> need to recompile a little bootloader (which is needed for setting up
|> the FPG
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 01:10:44PM -0700, Matt wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 09:34:21AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 09:26:18AM -0700, Wade Farnsworth wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 12:30, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 01:43:11PM -0500, Jason McMullan
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 09:34:21AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 09:26:18AM -0700, Wade Farnsworth wrote:
> > On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 12:30, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 01:43:11PM -0500, Jason McMullan wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 10:06 -0600, Kumar Gala w
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 01:47:30PM -0700, Dale Farnsworth wrote:
[snip]
> ===
> --- linux-2.5-usb-405.orig/arch/ppc/platforms/4xx/redwood5.c
> +++ linux-2.5-usb-405/arch/ppc/platforms/4xx/redwood5.c
> @@ -52,8 +52,18 @@
> void __ini
Tom,
On Mar 31, 2005, at 10:34 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 09:26:18AM -0700, Wade Farnsworth wrote:
> > On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 12:30, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 01:43:11PM -0500, Jason McMullan wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 10:06 -0600, Kumar Gala wro
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 12:45:44PM -0600, Kumar Gala wrote:
> Tom,
>
> On Mar 31, 2005, at 10:34 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> >On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 09:26:18AM -0700, Wade Farnsworth wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 12:30, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 01:43:11PM -0500, Jason McM
Well, it seems to be a historic problem. Freescale BSP was originally ported
from u-boot-1.0.0 and linux-2.4.22. So the BCSR was freely chosen as
0xf800. Later, we updated them to u-boot-1.1.1 and linux-2.4.26, and make
the BCSR consistent to older version. However the sourceforge u-boot
Hi Per,
> I think your main problem is that the stock 2.4.x kernel doesn't support
> ovecommit_memory type 2 (i believe)...
Doooh! You're so right!
I read the docs on overcommit_memory from 2.6 - stupid me!
> Look in mm/mmap.c and search for overcommit_memory, then do same
> in the sources for yo
opying or
distribution or forwarding of any or all of the contents in this message is
STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact
the sender by email and delete all copies; your cooperation in this regard
is appreciated.
**
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-embedded/attachments/20050331/1a82639d/attachment.htm
On Thu, 2005-03-31 at 06:33, Jon Masters wrote:
> Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> |> My intention was to give a device tree structure to the kernel at boot
> |> time via a (pseudo?) pointer in bd_info or similar.
> This got resurrected recently.
Hi!
> | I think this is reasonable. The best device tree
On Thu, 2005-03-31 at 02:22, Li Yang-r58472 wrote:
> Good point.
> There is also IMMR need to be passed from bootloader to kernel. We
> can make more use of the u-boot bd_info mechanism. But it binds ppc
> linux to u-boot boot loader. I don't know if we should make it a
> porting convention.
Hi
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 09:26:18AM -0700, Wade Farnsworth wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 12:30, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 01:43:11PM -0500, Jason McMullan wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 10:06 -0600, Kumar Gala wrote:
> > > > Can you build your patch for the lopec_defconfig and
On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 12:30, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 01:43:11PM -0500, Jason McMullan wrote:
> > On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 10:06 -0600, Kumar Gala wrote:
> > > Can you build your patch for the lopec_defconfig and fix the errors
> > > associated with enabling altivec.
> > >
> > > Loo
Hi,
I downloaded the viewml0.23 from site and configured it with
microwindows0.90 and FLNX0.14(FLTK1.0.7). When i gave the command make
all i received the following messages. Can anyone help me in solving
the problem in viewml 0.23 as early as possible.
**
Hi Per,
> I think your main problem is that the stock 2.4.x kernel doesn't support
> ovecommit_memory type 2 (i believe)...
Doooh! You're so right!
I read the docs on overcommit_memory from 2.6 - stupid me!
> Look in mm/mmap.c and search for overcommit_memory, then do same
> in the sources for yo
> > Look in mm/mmap.c and search for overcommit_memory, then do same
> > in the sources for your redhat kernels.
> I'll look into RH kernel to see if it isn't like you say :-)
>
> > Perhaps there's a patch for it floating around somewhere? ;-)
> Now, that would be really nice.
> Though I have no
> I do not have any problem with the functioning of U-Boot but
Linux crashes after
> printing "Uncompressing Kernel ... OK" and then it seems that nothing
is happening.
Do you have the SYPCR(serial watch dog timer) disabled?
> 3. The memory map of the VPN Board (MY B
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 04:22:26PM +0800, Li Yang-r58472 wrote:
> Good point.
> There is also IMMR need to be passed from bootloader to kernel. We
> can make more use of the u-boot bd_info mechanism. But it binds ppc
> linux to u-boot boot loader. I don't know if we should make it a
> porting
33 matches
Mail list logo
