David H. Lynch Jr. wrote:
> Kalle Pokki wrote:
>
>> 1. Put RAM to 0x000 and flash to some location it mirrors to your
>> boot vector. Linux always expects your physical memory to be at zero.
>> It is then mapped to virtual address 0xC000.
>
>In both this list and elsewhere I have see
The _GLOBAL() macro is for text symbols only. Changed to using
.globl for .data symbols. This is also needed in ppc32 land
to allow FSL Book-E, 40x, and 44x to work.
Signed-off-by: Kumar K. Gala
---
commit ca6e6d7a599f8e8a5976c044910b98ef30258e30
tree d220cd916c8bdb6bb9c5ddbdfc2ecbfa5004cf89
pa
The Lite5200 has an official Port to 2.6 by Sylvain Munaut
There is an Mapping MTD driver ready.
if it's not in vanilla, you found a patchset on Mailign archive or
on Sylvain's HP.
Am Mon, 17 Oct 2005 18:42:53 +0200 schrieb Alessandro Rubini
:
>
> Hello.
>
> I'm using linux-2.6.14-rc3-g4c
On Oct 18, 2005, at 10:24 AM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> For 8xx, I was wondering if the PARTNUM field of the IMMR
> (section 10.4.1 of MPC860UM.pdf) does have meaningful
> information which could be used to identify the CPU.
It has meaningful information, but not the way you want
to use it :-) T
Kalle Pokki wrote:
> David H. Lynch Jr wrote:
>
>>What exactly is the minimal startup system state the Linux 2.6.13
>> Kernel expects ?
>
>
> It's pretty hard to describe the system state fully, as there are so
> many registers it may depend on. However, I can point out a few things
> from
Hi Vitaly,
> This patch fixes a numbers of issues regarding to that both 8xx and 82xx
> began to use ppc_sys model:
> - Platform is now identified by default deviceless SOC, if no
> BOARD_CHIP_NAME is specified in the bard-specific header. For the list
> of supported names refer to (arch/
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 09:47:30AM +0100, Alex Zeffertt wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Oct 2005 11:44:41 -0700
> "Mark A. Greer" wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 12:35:43PM +0100, Alex Zeffertt wrote:
> > > Hi lists,
> > >
> > > I'm writing to let anybody (who may be interested) know that I've
> > > a
David H. Lynch Jr wrote:
>What exactly is the minimal startup system state the Linux 2.6.13
> Kernel expects ?
It's pretty hard to describe the system state fully, as there are so
many registers it may depend on. However, I can point out a few things
from your setup:
1. Put RAM to 0x0
Rune Torgersen wrote:
> Does anybody have a working patchset for fs_enet for 2.6.12?
>
> The patches I've found on this list (and on ozlab's patch list) I
> cannot get to compile.
Any news?
Regards,
Peter
On Mon, 17 Oct 2005 11:44:41 -0700
"Mark A. Greer" wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 12:35:43PM +0100, Alex Zeffertt wrote:
> > Hi lists,
> >
> > I'm writing to let anybody (who may be interested) know that I've
> > added support for the MPC8272ADS platform to the mpc8260sar ATM
> > device drive
On Mon, 2005-10-17 at 14:24 +0200, Nathael PAJANI wrote:
> I tried to reply to this thread:
> http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-embedded/2005-October/020555.html
> But it created a new one. not good.
That's a problem with the archives; it's not your fault. If you look at
the mailto: link a
What exactly is the minimal startup system state the Linux 2.6.13
Kernel expects ?
I am trying to bring up a xilinx V4 ppc 405 board.
It has flash based at 0x0 and DRAM based at ox9800.
I already have a working monitor/program loader and a filesystem of
the flash. I can fairl
12 matches
Mail list logo
