On 10/08/07 10:02 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 11:51:53AM +0200, Domen Puncer escreveu:
> > +static u8 null_mac[6];
>
> const
OK.
...
> > +static void fec_set_paddr(struct net_device *dev, u8 *mac)
> > +{
> > + struct fec_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
> > +
On 12/08/07 13:57 +, Ming Liu wrote:
> Dear all,
> I am reading LDD(V3) chapter 6 on the topic of wait_event(queue, condition)
> and wake_up(queue) functions. I am quite confused on the sayings. One is
> "Until condition evaluates to a true value, the process continues to
> sleep", which loo
Add file pattern to MAINTAINER entry
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index e295b18..896c8bf 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -2821,6 +2821,7 @@ M:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
W: http://www.penguinppc.org/
L: linuxppc-embedd
Add file pattern to MAINTAINER entry
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index 38810b7..e295b18 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -2813,6 +2813,7 @@ M:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
W: http://www.penguinppc.org/
L: linuxppc-embedd
Add file pattern to MAINTAINER entry
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index 896c8bf..a289176 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -2829,6 +2829,7 @@ M:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
W: http://www.penguinppc.org/
L: linuxppc-embedd
Add file pattern to MAINTAINER entry
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index 0862965..38810b7 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -2804,6 +2804,8 @@ M:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
W: http://www.penguinppc.org/
L: linuxppc-embedd
Dear Domen,
Thanks for your reply first.
>I understand it this way:
>- condition
> Just checking the condition is one way (if you don't have a wake_up
> source, like an interrupt), but that's not really what wait_event does.
> It would be something like
> while (condition) {
>
Add file pattern to MAINTAINER entry
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index 8282088..0862965 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -2795,6 +2795,8 @@ W:http://www.penguinppc.org/
L: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
L: linuxppc-embedd
On 13/08/07 08:33 +, Ming Liu wrote:
> Dear Domen,
> Thanks for your reply first.
>
> >I understand it this way:
> >- condition
> > Just checking the condition is one way (if you don't have a wake_up
> > source, like an interrupt), but that's not really what wait_event does.
> > It would b
Dear Momen,
OK. I see now. So you mean condition is only to judge whether a sleeping
process could be waken up or not when wake_up() is executed in other
processes or interrupt handlers. What really wakes the process up is still
the function of wake_up, right? We just execute wake_up() and then
On Monday 13 August 2007 11:22, Ming Liu wrote:
> Dear Momen,
> OK. I see now. So you mean condition is only to judge whether a sleeping
> process could be waken up or not when wake_up() is executed in other
> processes or interrupt handlers. What really wakes the process up is still
> the function
On 13/08/07 09:22 +, Ming Liu wrote:
> Dear Momen,
> OK. I see now. So you mean condition is only to judge whether a sleeping
> process could be waken up or not when wake_up() is executed in other
> processes or interrupt handlers. What really wakes the process up is still
> the function of
Thank you so much for your explanation. Now I am quite clear on this topic.
Domen, Sorry for my misspelling of your name. That should be "Domen" not
"Momen". Sorry for that. :)
BR
Ming
>From: Domen Puncer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: Ming Liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>CC: Linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 23:31:11 -0700
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Add file pattern to MAINTAINER entry
>
> Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index 0862965..38810b7 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -2804,6 +2804,8 @@ M:
I have mpc83xx, and I work with Linux 2.6
I am trying to use power management states.
I succeed to get into D1 state (echo standby > /sys/power/state),
And to waked up by GPIO.
But when I try tried echo mem > /sys/power/state it waked up by reset
(that stuck in the middle)
Or echo disk > /sys
Hello,
I am having some problems with the initialization of BAR registers of
the PCI bus. I have a number of devices connected to the bus, which have
a BAR-size of less than PAGE_SIZE. For example:
01:00.0 Network controller: VMIC: Unknown device 5565 (rev 01)
Subsystem: PLX Technology,
Did you ever solve this problem? I have a module with a similar
architecture as the one you described and I can get this same data parity
failure just by making the L2 cache private memory and copying a file into
the L2 cache.
Thanks
Chuck Brown
___
L
We're starting a new MPC5200 project and I'm trying to track down the
best kernel to start from. Is Sylvain's tree at
http://www.246tnt.com/mpc52xx/ a good place to start? The git URLs
from the web page don't work. Everything 5200 related in the trees at
Secret Labs already appears to be merged.
M
On Mon, Aug 13, 2007 at 02:44:50PM +0300, Yoni Levin wrote:
> I have mpc83xx, and I work with Linux 2.6
>
> I am trying to use power management states.
>
> I succeed to get into D1 state (echo standby > /sys/power/state),
That's actually closer to D3hot than D1. It uses sleep mode, but does
no
On 8/13/07, Jon Smirl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We're starting a new MPC5200 project and I'm trying to track down the
> best kernel to start from. Is Sylvain's tree at
> http://www.246tnt.com/mpc52xx/ a good place to start? The git URLs
> from the web page don't work. Everything 5200 related in
On 8/13/07, Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/13/07, Jon Smirl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > We're starting a new MPC5200 project and I'm trying to track down the
> > best kernel to start from. Is Sylvain's tree at
> > http://www.246tnt.com/mpc52xx/ a good place to start? The git URLs
Another series is being posted to the Efika boards.
0001-powerpc-exports-rheap-symbol-to-modules.patch
0002-powerpc-Changes-the-config-mechanism-for-rheap.patch
0003-powerpc-ppc32-Update-mpc52xx_psc-structure-with-B-r.patch
0004-powerpc-BestComm-core-support-for-Freescale-MPC5200.patch
0005-powerp
On Mon, 2007-08-13 at 06:18 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> You're missing arch/ppc/platforms/4xx/, among other things.
> Also, we're in the middle of merging 4xx to arch/powerpc.
We can leave the whole block unmodified until you're ready.
LINUX FOR POWERPC EMBEDDED PPC4XX
P: Matt Porter
M:
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 10:35:01 -0700
Joe Perches <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-08-13 at 06:18 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > You're missing arch/ppc/platforms/4xx/, among other things.
> > Also, we're in the middle of merging 4xx to arch/powerpc.
>
> We can leave the whole block unmodifie
The current (2.6.22) patchset for the Efika is being held here for
the moment; http://dev.gentoo.org/~nixnut/efika/
That's everything you 'really need' and it's probably the same as
this patch list.
However practically none of it is mainline-worthy at the moment,
Sylvain has detailed too many thi
Grant Likely wrote:
> On 8/13/07, Jon Smirl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> We're starting a new MPC5200 project and I'm trying to track down
>> the best kernel to start from. Is Sylvain's tree at
>> http://www.246tnt.com/mpc52xx/ a good place to start? The git URLs
>> from the web page don't work
On 8/13/07, Matt Sealey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'll put in a decent request here for any work on this subject to
> please at least attempt to retrieve the tasks from the Efika
> firmware rather than replacing them in Linux gratuituously.
> I understand this doesn't help the Lite5200 guys.. bu
Allow the address of the Ten Bit Interface (TBI) to be changed in the
event of a conflict with another device.
Signed-off by: Joe Hamman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
diff --git a/drivers/net/Kconfig b/drivers/net/Kconfig
index 81ef81c..ba67b3b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/net/Kconfig
Allow the address of the Ten Bit Interface (TBI) to be changed in the
event of a conflict with another device.
Signed-off by: Joe Hamman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Please ignore the last patch - I missed a cut & paste error on the range
that my testing didn't catch.
---
diff --git a/drivers/net/Kco
Does anyboady have adapter.c file (or any source code) for Linux kernel
driver for Xilinx EMAC IP core, WORKING in POLLING mode? For certain
reasons I cannot use interrupt in my system.
Thanks,
Leonid.
___
Linuxppc-embedded mailing list
Linuxppc-embedd
I wrote the disassembler below but never was able to get MPC5200/I2S
DMA running. Hope you can further BestComm code
Copy of Posting 3/30/2006:
BestComm Dudes:
I was able to contact Davide Santo, AN2604 "Introduction to BestComm".
He admitted the short commings of his document in the a
Hi:
I have several boards with different architectures (Microblaze, PPC),
running Linux/uClinux and using Xilinx IP cores. I use both Virtex and
Spartan FPGAs.
Historically I'm using different kernels for them, starting from uClinux
2.4, all way through Linux 2.6.16 and 2.6.19. I patched them her
On Aug 13, 2007, at 5:37 PM, Joe Hamman wrote:
> Allow the address of the Ten Bit Interface (TBI) to be changed in the
> event of a conflict with another device.
>
> Signed-off by: Joe Hamman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
>
> Please ignore the last patch - I missed a cut & paste error on the
> rang
> -Original Message-
> From: Kumar Gala [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, August 13, 2007 10:10 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] [UPDATED] tsec: Allow Ten Bit Interface to be
> configurable
>
>
> On Aug 13, 2007, at 5:37 PM, Joe
Hi Leonid,
I am in the process of publishing a Xilinx Linux git tree which will
contain most of the drivers for Xilinx IP including recent contributions
from Grant Likely, John Williams, Joachim Foerster and others.
This tree will be available on the Xilinx git server soon, however it
will be a n
35 matches
Mail list logo
