On Mon, Oct 01, 2007 at 02:59:11PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Mon, 01 Oct 2007 15:49:22 -0400
> Ben Warren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Perhaps my perspective is unique, but I doubt it. I find it nice that
> > this list is low volume and not filled with endless patches about CHRP
> > and P s
Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Mon, 01 Oct 2007 15:49:22 -0400
> Ben Warren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> Mark A. Greer wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 04:28:30PM -0500, Olof Johansson wrote:
>>>
>>>
On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 03:03:12PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Mon, 01 Oct 2007 15:49:22 -0400
Ben Warren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mark A. Greer wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 04:28:30PM -0500, Olof Johansson wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 03:03:12PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 12:53:51 -0700
> >>> "Mark
Mark A. Greer wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 04:28:30PM -0500, Olof Johansson wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 03:03:12PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 12:53:51 -0700
>>> "Mark A. Greer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>
On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 12:41:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 04:28:30PM -0500, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 03:03:12PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 12:53:51 -0700
> > "Mark A. Greer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 12:41:57PM -0700, D'Abbraccio Joe-ljd015 wrote:
> >
On Monday 01 October 2007 10:35, Juergen Beisert wrote:
> 2) Same target runs 2.6.23-rc8-rt1
>
> @host$ nmap 192.168.23.226
>
> Starting Nmap 4.20 ( http://insecure.org ) at 2007-10-01 10:15 CEST
> Interesting ports on 192.168.23.226:
> Not shown: 871 filtered ports, 824 closed ports
> PORT STATE
On Sun, Sep 30, 2007 at 10:38:32PM -0700, Misbah khan wrote:
> Olof Johansson-2 wrote:
> >
> > First, PLEASE stop quoting your own text. Do not append > in front of
> > the lines you write yourself in the reply. It makes it impossible to
> > tell what parts are new and what are old.
Please read
Hi everybody,
I need to export some read-only board-specific information (serial number,
boot mode jumper configuration, ...) to userspace applications.
Could anyone advice me on the preferred way to do that ? I can easily add a
quick&dirty sysfs/procfs based implementation, but I was wondering
On Friday 28 September 2007 17:38, Jon Smirl wrote:
> On 9/28/07, Juergen Beisert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > But I can't run it a second time, as the network on target's side doesn't
> > respond. Any idea?
>
> Do the stress tests complete on a non-rt kernel?
I tried it again:
1) Target runs 2