Re: [PATCH] Add platform support for the MPC837x RDB board

2007-10-01 Thread Mark A. Greer
On Mon, Oct 01, 2007 at 02:59:11PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Mon, 01 Oct 2007 15:49:22 -0400 > Ben Warren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Perhaps my perspective is unique, but I doubt it. I find it nice that > > this list is low volume and not filled with endless patches about CHRP > > and P s

Re: [PATCH] Add platform support for the MPC837x RDB board

2007-10-01 Thread Ben Warren
Josh Boyer wrote: > On Mon, 01 Oct 2007 15:49:22 -0400 > Ben Warren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> Mark A. Greer wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 04:28:30PM -0500, Olof Johansson wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 03:03:12PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:

Re: [PATCH] Add platform support for the MPC837x RDB board

2007-10-01 Thread Josh Boyer
On Mon, 01 Oct 2007 15:49:22 -0400 Ben Warren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mark A. Greer wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 04:28:30PM -0500, Olof Johansson wrote: > > > >> On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 03:03:12PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > >> > >>> On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 12:53:51 -0700 > >>> "Mark

Re: [PATCH] Add platform support for the MPC837x RDB board

2007-10-01 Thread Ben Warren
Mark A. Greer wrote: > On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 04:28:30PM -0500, Olof Johansson wrote: > >> On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 03:03:12PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: >> >>> On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 12:53:51 -0700 >>> "Mark A. Greer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 12:41:

Re: [PATCH] Add platform support for the MPC837x RDB board

2007-10-01 Thread Mark A. Greer
On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 04:28:30PM -0500, Olof Johansson wrote: > On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 03:03:12PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > > On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 12:53:51 -0700 > > "Mark A. Greer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 12:41:57PM -0700, D'Abbraccio Joe-ljd015 wrote: > >

Re: [RFC PATCH v0.1] net driver: mpc52xx fec

2007-10-01 Thread Juergen Beisert
On Monday 01 October 2007 10:35, Juergen Beisert wrote: > 2) Same target runs 2.6.23-rc8-rt1 > > @host$ nmap 192.168.23.226 > > Starting Nmap 4.20 ( http://insecure.org ) at 2007-10-01 10:15 CEST > Interesting ports on 192.168.23.226: > Not shown: 871 filtered ports, 824 closed ports > PORT STATE

Re: Is it safe to use these Linux function (test_bit(), set_bit(), clear_bit()) in character device driver for 2.6.10 ppc kernel.

2007-10-01 Thread Olof Johansson
On Sun, Sep 30, 2007 at 10:38:32PM -0700, Misbah khan wrote: > Olof Johansson-2 wrote: > > > > First, PLEASE stop quoting your own text. Do not append > in front of > > the lines you write yourself in the reply. It makes it impossible to > > tell what parts are new and what are old. Please read

What's the preferred way to export board information to userspace ?

2007-10-01 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi everybody, I need to export some read-only board-specific information (serial number, boot mode jumper configuration, ...) to userspace applications. Could anyone advice me on the preferred way to do that ? I can easily add a quick&dirty sysfs/procfs based implementation, but I was wondering

Re: [RFC PATCH v0.1] net driver: mpc52xx fec

2007-10-01 Thread Juergen Beisert
On Friday 28 September 2007 17:38, Jon Smirl wrote: > On 9/28/07, Juergen Beisert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > But I can't run it a second time, as the network on target's side doesn't > > respond. Any idea? > > Do the stress tests complete on a non-rt kernel? I tried it again: 1) Target runs 2