RE: USB device for ppc440epx

2008-01-23 Thread Leonid
Hi, Josh: Ooops, I didn't notice I have hijacked someone's thread, I thought I created a new one. I am very sorry if I have done so, I'll be more careful. Regarding USB Mass Storage there are device drivers (Host side) of course. However I am asking regarding USB device implementation itself. Can

Re: USB device for ppc440epx

2008-01-23 Thread Josh Boyer
On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 17:01:02 -0800 "Leonid" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi: > > does somebody have code example for USB 2.0 device implementation for > ppc440epx, preferably Mass Storage device, but any will do. > > If not for ppc440epx (Sequoia board), ppc440ep (Yosemite) code will also > help

USB device for ppc440epx

2008-01-23 Thread Leonid
Hi: does somebody have code example for USB 2.0 device implementation for ppc440epx, preferably Mass Storage device, but any will do. If not for ppc440epx (Sequoia board), ppc440ep (Yosemite) code will also help (according to CPU user manual USB device interface is practically the same). If this

RE: Xilinx XPS_LL_TEMAC vs PLB_TEMAC

2008-01-23 Thread Stephen Neuendorffer
The LL_TEMAC can be connected in two topologies. One connects the locallink directly to the SDMA port of the MPMC3. The other topology connects to a PLB46 bus using an XPS_LL_FIFO, which (most likely) connects to the plb bus port of the mpmc. The easiest way to decipher the connection pattern i

Re: framebuffer swap endianess

2008-01-23 Thread Kumar Gala
On Jan 23, 2008, at 1:39 AM, Roman Fietze wrote: > Hello ANgelo, > > On Tuesday 22 January 2008 16:46:47 Angelo wrote: > >> I have just create a framebuffer for an embedded system: >> - powerpc (little endian) with a GPU (big endian). > > Are you sure? Isn't it the other way around? we are sur

Re: CONFIG_PCI interaction with pata_platform driver on MPC834x board

2008-01-23 Thread Kumar Gala
On Jan 23, 2008, at 9:06 AM, Johns Daniel wrote: > I am asking this question once more since my previous try -- right > before the Christmas break -- did not elicit any responses! ;~) > > Without PCI support configured in the kernel, the CompactFlash card is > discovered and configured by the k

RE: Xilinx XPS_LL_TEMAC vs PLB_TEMAC

2008-01-23 Thread Mohammad Sadegh Sadri
So, in this case, our base system, created with EDK 9.2 will not be the same as previous systems, as shown in http://www.xilinx.com/esp/wired/optical/xlnx_net/mpmc.htm PLB and OPB usage is limited to a small area of design... Subject: RE: Xilinx XPS_LL_TEMAC vs PLB_TEMAC Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008

Re: CONFIG_PCI interaction with pata_platform driver on MPC834x board

2008-01-23 Thread Johns Daniel
I am asking this question once more since my previous try -- right before the Christmas break -- did not elicit any responses! ;~) Without PCI support configured in the kernel, the CompactFlash card is discovered and configured by the kernel. With PCI support configured in the kernel, it fails t

RE: Xilinx XPS_LL_TEMAC vs PLB_TEMAC

2008-01-23 Thread Koss, Mike (Mission Systems)
Actually, with the MPMC3 the XPS_LL_TEMAC still can directly connect to the MPMC. You set one of the ports' type to SDMA and it instantiates what is similar to the old CDMAC. From: Mohammad Sadegh Sadri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2008

How to support removable CF card via IDE on MPC52xx

2008-01-23 Thread Henk Stegeman
I have IDE working on my MPC5200B based system using the driver: drivers/ide/ppc/mpc52xx_ide. The IDE device is a compact flash card inserted in a compact flash slot on the CPU board. Two separate pins (reset and card-detect) are provided to the CPU to force a reset and to detect the presence of