Sometime recently it seems to have become possible to disable the
whole block device subsystem.
Though in my tests I can't quit build with it disabled.
Anyway, for an embedded device this might be appealing.
how does this interact with initramfs and flash ?
Can I boot an i
So when you have Xilinx under powerpc working, do we pull it from your
git tree or the xilinx one ?
Will there be an announcement ?
How about a one paragraph getting started guide to moving a xilinx
ppc bsp to
xilinx powerpc.
Like ?
step 1).
Generate a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks so much for the driver. I have a few doubts.. .may be u cud
> help me out with it Basically, I am working on the PPC 405EX
> processor with a peripheral attached to the EBC. I've requested for
> I/O memory & mapped it using ioremap. The following are
Hi,
I am working on the PPC 405EX processor with a peripheral attached to the
EBC. I've requested for I/O memory & mapped it using ioremap. The following
are my doubts:
1) How do I ensure that the memory range that I requested is non-cacheable.
I've to work with non-cacheable memory. I've reque
Try using hard_temac_v3_00_a with the ML403 board. There's an
incompatibility (posted previously on this list) with PHY access. This
could be causing the strange behavior you're seeing.
-Rick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of A. Nolson
Se
On Feb 20, 2008, at 10:13 AM, Marco Stornelli wrote:
> Kumar Gala wrote:
>>> Marco Stornelli wrote:
>>>
No, but I can try to backport the PCI-E code from 2.6.24 to 2.6.18
if it could help. What do you think about it? Do you think this
problem could be not present in 2.6.24?
I
I am working on getting avahi-daemon along with nss-mdns up and running on
an the AMCC Kilauea/Haleakala development boards and noted that in order for
other systems to discover it and vice versa, ALLMULTI has to be enabled on
'eth0'.
Is this a known works-as-designed aspect of the IBM new_emac d
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 3:03 PM, David Baird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 1:57 PM, Ricardo Ayres Severo
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have a simple doubt, but I find no answer. What is the difference
> > between the powerpc tree to the ppc tree in the kernel source
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 1:57 PM, Ricardo Ayres Severo
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a simple doubt, but I find no answer. What is the difference
> between the powerpc tree to the ppc tree in the kernel source?
> Which one should I use with a virtex II pro board?
ppc (32-bit versions) and
Hi Ricardo,
On Feb 20, 2008 2:29 PM, Ricardo Ayres Severo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I didn't solve the problem yet. I'm having problems with the memset_io
> in early_init and am studying if the SDRAM is initializing right.
> Any progress I'll send to the list.
It sounds suspiciously like you m
Hi Robert,
I didn't solve the problem yet. I'm having problems with the memset_io
in early_init and am studying if the SDRAM is initializing right.
Any progress I'll send to the list.
Good luck,
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 7:24 PM, Robert Woodworth
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Have you solved your p
Have you solved your problem??
I'm having the *EXACT* same problem on a Virtex4FX60.
The device is configured with PLBv46/MPMC3/LL_TEMAC.
I'm under the suspicion that the PLB is issuing an error when switching
to virtual mode and that there is either a timing/synthesis error or a
fundamental erro
Hi all,
I have a simple doubt, but I find no answer. What is the difference
between the powerpc tree to the ppc tree in the kernel source?
Which one should I use with a virtex II pro board?
Thanks,
--
Ricardo Ayres Severo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
___
Linux
>
> Try to specify the addresses of the other sections listed by "cat
> /sys/module/my-mod/sections/:
>
> add-symbol-file my-mod.o 0xcf030060\
>-s .rodata 0xcf030354\
>-s .data 0xcf030488\
>-s .sdata 0xcf030488\
>-s .bss0xcf030519\
>-s .sbss 0xcf03051c
>
> Wolfgang
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008, Ben Warren wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 10:03 AM, Kalle Pokki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I tried to copy the ELDK 4.0 installation I had to a new Core 2 Quad
> > machine running 64-bit Ubuntu 7.10, but the new machine refuses to
> > execute the cross com
Hi,
I am working with a ML403 platform and I have my kernel 2.6.24rc3
perfectly running on it. Almost everything seems to work but the
ethernet. I am using the IP cores that come with the EDK 9.1sp2 (
plb_emac 3.00a + hard_temac 3.00b). The weird thing arises when I try to
bring up the interf
Kumar Gala wrote:
>> Marco Stornelli wrote:
>>
>>> No, but I can try to backport the PCI-E code from 2.6.24 to 2.6.18
>>> if it could help. What do you think about it? Do you think this
>>> problem could be not present in 2.6.24?
>>> I have no idea there, honestly. Sorry.
>As Jon said, try 2.6.24
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 10:03 AM, Kalle Pokki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried to copy the ELDK 4.0 installation I had to a new Core 2 Quad
> machine running 64-bit Ubuntu 7.10, but the new machine refuses to
> execute the cross compiler. Has anyone succeeded in running ELDK in
> th
Josh Boyer wrote:
>> Does anyone have sample drivers in Linux for the EBC interface for PPC405Ex?
>> I would be thankful if someone could put in a sample code here.
>
> Linux typically doesn't touch the EBC itself. That is normally set up
> by firmware such as U-Boot and Linux uses it as-is.
>
Hi,
I tried to copy the ELDK 4.0 installation I had to a new Core 2 Quad
machine running 64-bit Ubuntu 7.10, but the new machine refuses to
execute the cross compiler. Has anyone succeeded in running ELDK in
this kind of environment?
I also tried compiling the ELDK from source RPMs as described i
Hello everybody,
I created a tiny root filesystem, just with Busybox, that I want to use as
rootfs through initramfs (and keep it as the final root filesystem).
First of all, I probed this root filesystem using NFS to be sure it worked
and in fact, it did. Then I created an init file which is a
maxime louvel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> first of all I am sorry if this is not the good place to ask that but I
> don't know where else ...
> My question is:
>
> Does anyone knows the difference between the mpc8548amc and mpc8548cds
> platforms ?
Sorry, no knowledge of the AMC board here.
> I am worki
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> Sorry if this is the wrong place to post this question. I'm
> developing a
>>> NAND flash driver and I need to do some detailed dubugging using GDB
> with
>>> a BDI2K. According to the Denx web site, to find out the address that
> the
Hi,
first of all I am sorry if this is not the good place to ask that but I
don't know where else ...
My question is:
Does anyone knows the difference between the mpc8548amc and mpc8548cds
platforms ?
I am working on an amc one but the 2.6.24 kernel is supporting only the cds
one.
Do you know if
On Feb 20, 2008, at 7:00 AM, maxime louvel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> yes It has something like 16550 UART.
> the compiler version is gcc-3.4.3 with some specific stuff for the
> platform.
> I also have a gcc-4.1.2 vanilla which has been compiled with the
> previous one. The 4.1.2 works if you tell it
Hi,
yes It has something like 16550 UART.
the compiler version is gcc-3.4.3 with some specific stuff for the platform.
I also have a gcc-4.1.2 vanilla which has been compiled with the previous
one. The 4.1.2 works if you tell it to emulate the floating point
instructions.
thanks Scott,
without th
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 20:13:24 -0800 (PST)
Silwer star <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Does anyone have sample drivers in Linux for the EBC interface for PPC405Ex?
> I would be thankful if someone could put in a sample code here.
Linux typically doesn't touch the EBC itself. That is normally set
27 matches
Mail list logo
