Re: Device Tree setup for 8272-based board

2008-12-22 Thread Daniel Ng
Scott Wood freescale.com> writes: > cuboot-824x is for 8240, 8245, and similar chips. You want cuboot-pq2. Hi Scott et al, I seem to get further with the cuboot-824x file- with the cuboot-pq2 file the boot sequence doesn't even reach the 'zImage starting' stage. The machine reboots just befor

Re: uboot 1.3.0 compatible with linux 2.6.21?

2008-12-22 Thread Scott Wood
Joe Shmo wrote: I'm using a board that is a derivative of the 8313ERDB board. The freescale BSP for that board included a patched uboot 1.1.6 that works with the 2.6.21 kernel. [snip] I've changed the DTS file describing our hardware and recompiled it, but no luck. I'm wondering if the differ

uboot 1.3.0 compatible with linux 2.6.21?

2008-12-22 Thread Joe Shmo
I'm using a board that is a derivative of the 8313ERDB board. The freescale BSP for that board included a patched uboot 1.1.6 that works with the 2.6.21 kernel. On my board, I could not get the 1.1.6 uboot to boot so I tried the 1.3.0 version. This boots just fine and is able to do TFTP with o

Re: Device Tree setup for 8272-based board

2008-12-22 Thread Scott Wood
Daniel Ng wrote: Thanks for your helpful responses Scott and Ming Qian. Now, from reading the docco can you please verify my understanding is correct?- First, I need a basic DTS file which will give me a basic Device Tree. The cuboot*.c file takes care of adding other parameters to the Device

Re: mpc8xxx_gpio.c on mpc8349e-mitx

2008-12-22 Thread Peter Korsgaard
> "Steve" == Steve DeLaney writes: Hi, Steve> We are currently working on LTIB toolchain, and are upgrading Steve> a GPIO driver on MPC8349E-MITX platform. Steve> This has taken us to the latest kernel 2.6.27.10 Steve> we ran across a patch on ozlabs patchwork that looks like it should