Duy-Ky Nguyen wrote:
Hello,
I'm using u-boot 1.3.0 from the latest FreeScale Linux BSP MPC8313E-RDB.
Wrong mailing list. Try mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
regards,
Ben
___
Linuxppc-embedded mailing list
Linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mai
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 7:38 PM, Laxmikant Rashinkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a MPC8347 based board that runs linux-2.6.15.4 and 2.6.27.1.
>
> With the older Linux, my driver is able to successfully request_irq()
> interrupts 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23 & 48.
>
> But with the newer
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 10:03 AM, Kalle Pokki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried to copy the ELDK 4.0 installation I had to a new Core 2 Quad
> machine running 64-bit Ubuntu 7.10, but the new machine refuses to
> execute the cross compiler. Has anyone succeeded in running ELDK in
> th
Hey Bruce,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> __asm__ __volatile__("lwz%U1%X1 %0,%1; twi 0,%0,0; isync" : "=r"
>
> (ret)
>
>>> :
>>>
> "m" (*addr));
>
They allow the compiler to use update and/or index mode for the
> memory
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Ben Warren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 01/17/2008 07:01:10 AM:
>
>
>> I've attached a poorly-written-yet-functional GPIO driver that I wrote a
>>
>
>
>> while ago for the MPC8349 (same as what you have for all inte
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include "gpio.h"
struct gpio_dev {
struct gpio_reg *regs;
struct cdev cdev;
};
MODULE_AUTHOR("Ben Warren");
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
static int gpio_major_num;
static struct gpio_dev *gpio_devices;
static spinlock_t gpioLock[G
Hi Jeff,
Jeff Parent wrote:
> I'm building a linux distro for work, that runs on embedded systems
> with either and ARM 9 or a PowerPC 603. I've had great luck building
> a cross compiler w/ crosstools and using them in the compiler jail
> created by Scratchbox. Now I am working on porting al
khollan wrote:
>
> John Hahn wrote:
>
>> We are also using 3.81 make (Centos 5 distro) with ELDK 4.1 version
>> downloaded from www.denx.de and have had no problems using the u-boot.zip
>> srcs from www.xilinx.com/ml410_p, though we use uboot for our ml403 based
>> development, we can build u-bo
HI Stuart,
Stuart Hodgson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have been suing the eldk4.1 tool chain for a few months now and have
> not not encountered any problems with building until now. I build for
> two slightly different archs, ppc_85xx and ppx_82xx.
>
> The problem I have come up against is related to so
Fabio,
Note: I've changed the e-mail subject back to the original. In the
future, please ensure that it remains intact.
fabio777 wrote:
> Thanks Ben,
>
> Here it is
>
> static struct fsl_spi_platform_data k_platform_data = {
> .initial_spmode = 0,
> .bus_num = 1,
Probably should be bus_num = 0
>
fabio777 wrote:
> Has anyone been using this driver ?
>
I use it, on ARCH=powerpc, though.
> For legacy reasons I need to keep the ppc=arch however I haven't found
> out how to get this driver probed at start-up even basing my init on
> Lublock.
>
>
The driver's expecting a platform device
Michael Brian Willis wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 14:44 -0400, Ben Warren wrote:
>
>
>> This device driver is a platform driver, so you need to register a
>> platform device somewhere in your board-specific init code that contains
>> the hardware deta
Michael Brian Willis wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-10-12 at 15:48 -0400, Ben Warren wrote:
>
>
>> Here's what I use:
>>
>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=113877891224982&w=2
>>
>
> Thanks for the response Ben.
>
> I have put
Michael Brian Willis wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am using an MPC8540 based embedded system with a Compact Flash card in
> true IDE mode. The Compact Flash card is directly connected to the
> MPC8540 bus without the use of a pcmcia adapter.
>
> The Compact Flash card is being initialized correctly using
Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Mon, 01 Oct 2007 15:49:22 -0400
> Ben Warren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> Mark A. Greer wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 04:28:30PM -0500, Olof Johansson wrote:
>>>
>>>
>&g
Mark A. Greer wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 04:28:30PM -0500, Olof Johansson wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 03:03:12PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 12:53:51 -0700
>>> "Mark A. Greer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>
On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 12:41:
Manil Gaouar wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have been trying many things to solve this problem, I found using a
> JTAG that U-Boot is running from flash so my JP9 jumper should stay in
> BCSR.
>
>
This is off-topic here. Please re-post to the U-boot mailing list, and
try to be more concise:
mailto:[EMA
Erik Christiansen wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 12:08:47PM -0600, Alan Bennett wrote:
>
>> BDI 2000 Config File:
>> ; initialize - FLASH BR0 & OR0 (64 Mbyte)
>> ;***
>> WM320xf0010100 0xfc001801
>> WM32 0xf0010104 0xfc0008c2
>>
Nethra,
On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 02:29 -0700, Nethra wrote:
> hi,
>
> I m using custom board same as eval board MPC8272ADS board.
>
> IP assigned for both ethernets are...
>
> ifconfig eth1 192.168.33.135 up
>ifconfig eth1 netmask 255.255.248.0
>route add default gw 1
Hi Jocke,
On Fri, 2007-06-29 at 13:34 +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> I too am adding such a IRQ for my PHY connected to external IRQ2.
> The PHY is connetced to UCC2.
> I have this in my DTS for the PHY:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] {
> #address-cells = <1>;
>
Hi Antonio,
On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 12:30 +0200, DI BACCO ANTONIO - technolabs wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> how can I avoid that fs_enet driver uses its associated phy? My problem
> is that my FEC is attached to a switch and three other ports of the
> switch are connected to three physical connectors. I d
--- Mohammad Sadegh Sadri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> thanks for suggestions
> I added rsize=1024,wsize=1024 to CMD LINE. INIT can now be executed from nfs,
> but I think that the problem still exists,
> during the start up process ( from when the rootfs is mounted until user get
Hi Mohammad,
On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 14:41 +, Mohammad Sadegh Sadri wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> well I could bring up the grant's kernel on ml403 completely. the root file
> system was over nfs.
>
> when I use a 100mbits link for connection to ml403 , every thing is working
> suitably.
> but when
On Fri, 2007-05-11 at 15:15 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> I assume you're code doesn't look exactly like this. You'll need to
> use the virq in the request_irq()... its most likely just random luck
> if things are working and you aren't using the virq returned from
> irq_create_mapping()
>
Alex,
On Fri, 2007-05-11 at 10:29 +0100, Alex Zeffertt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for your reply Ben, but I think my problem is slightly different. It
> is not
> that the sense (high/low/rising/falling) of the interrupt is wrong, but that
> the
> kernel will not allow me to register the handler.
Alex,
Follow this thread...
http://marc.info/?l=linuxppc-embedded&m=116849062702002&w=2
On Thu, 2007-05-10 at 17:45 +0100, Alex Zeffertt wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I'm trying to port a driver from 2.6.11 to 2.6.21 and I'm stuck on the
> following line:
>
> request_irq(MPC83xx_IRQ_EXT5, mpc832
Thanks Arnd,
--- Arnd Bergmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 20 April 2007, Ben Warren wrote:
> > The cross-compiled glibc that is included in ELDK 4.0 doesn't seem to
> > have support for POSIX semaphores. I get the following runtime errors:
> >
Hello,
The cross-compiled glibc that is included in ELDK 4.0 doesn't seem to
have support for POSIX semaphores. I get the following runtime errors:
sem_open: Function not implemented
when trying to implement a named semaphore, and
sem_init: Function not implemented
when trying to imple
Zhivko,
On Tue, 2007-04-10 at 16:51 +0200, powerpc440 wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I have multiple boards, based on ppc405ep (which include on-chip two
> ethernet ports). I'm configure the MAC address in u-boot and all works
> great. The problem appears when I use two or more boards in one network,
>
s for bringing it back in!
> >-Original Message-
> >From: Ben Warren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Sent: Monday, April 09, 2007 4:30 PM
> >To: Benedict, Michael
> >Subject: Re: MPC 8349e-mITX and MTD/Flash
> >
> >I suspect that MTD doesn't know anything a
Gary,
--- Gary Kenaley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have been evaluating Freescale 2.6.11, Wind River
> 2.6.14, and am now
> attempting Denx 2.6.19 (from ELDK 4.1) - running on
> the Rev 1.0 MPC8349E
> MDS (V1.1 CPU). I boot 2.6.19.2 using the factory
> u-boot 1.1.3 and the
> kernel immediately
Matthias,
--- Matthias Fechner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Grant,
>
> * Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [12-03-07
> 12:36]:
> > Looks like you're trying to access inital data
> (which is freed after
> > module load) from regular code (which is not)
>
> is it possible to find the line of
Thanks Chris & Kumar,
--- alayrac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The type of reset is recorded in the most-recent
> reset field of the
> debug-status register (DBSR[MRR]). System software
> can examine this
> field if it needs to determine the cause of a reset.
> The effect of a
> reset on the proc
Hello,
Is there an API call, either Linux or PowerPC-specific, for determining
the cause of the last reset? I can certainly read the RSR myself, but
why bother if the information's available elsewhere.
thanks,
Ben
___
Linuxppc-embedded mailing list
Li
Bruce,
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We're designing a new product and we want to put a
> CF card in it. We're
> thinking the easiest way to do that is to put in a
> PCI-CF bridge and we
> would like to use the TI1520 because it's industrial
> rated which we need.
> We can get th
--- Nethra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> steps falloed are..
>
> 1. erase FF80 FFDF
> 2. tftpboot 0x10 image.jffs2
> 3. cp.b 10 FF80 4dc874
>
This looks OK, assuming the size of the file was
4dc874... Can you send the output of 'flinfo',
please?
> physmap flash device: 8
--- Nethra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> thanks ben,
>
> I have already tried to build jffs2 image as per
> link mentioned using
> mkfs.jffs2 utility, but mkfs.jffs2 is absent in
> host...so i downloded
> mkfs.jffs2 from net and used the same to create the
> image.Is it the correct
> way?
Bruce,
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I know this isn't the right forum for this but I
> can't seem to find a
> generic PPC mailing list.
>
> I'm trying to get a global timer going on an
> MPC834x, and the way I learn
> is to just play with HW, so I've got an Abatron
> BDI2K hooked up to my
>
On Thu, 2007-02-22 at 20:28 -0800, Nethra wrote:
>
> thanks...
>
> what are the steps to create jffs2 image?
>
Here's a good link on building a JFFS2 filesystem:
http://www.denx.de/wiki/view/DULG/RootFileSystemOnAJFFS2FileSystem
> do i need to disable nfs option in kernel?
No. Both can happily
On Wed, 2007-02-21 at 17:18 +0530, pjmaiya wrote:
> Dear Ben,
> I have tried following option, with host as ppc_8xx, since we are using
> mpc860 processor and also we are using montavista provided compiler
> (ppc_8xx).
> Our embedded target runs on montavista linux with mpc860 processor and
>
On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 17:09 +0530, pjmaiya wrote:
> hi,
> I have successfully complied and used 'clish' in host system (i686
> machine)
> But I need to port the same for PPC platform. Can anyone suggest me how to
> do the same.
>
> thanx in advace,
> pjmaiya
>
Like many other projects, I bel
Tom,
I feel your pain.
On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 16:55 -0500, Morrison, Tom wrote:
> All,
>
> I've looked at the Documentation/powerpc/booting_without_of.txt,
> and this gives an explanation of the internal parts of the dts file,
> but it doesn't tell me how to practically pass it to the kernel
On Thu, 2007-02-08 at 13:29 +0100, Frank Prepelica wrote:
>
> I got a problem. After rebooting linux system on the target,
>
> the target “hangs”. How could I get that the target makes a reset
>
> to start u-boot or linux again?
You'll need to provide some details. With the information you've
Pjmaiya,
On Thu, 2007-02-08 at 18:32 +0530, pjmaiya wrote:
> Hi,
>Can anybody give me link/built in package or source code for
> implmenting CLI for embedded system on linux. We have tried to
> implement our own CLI on linux(with bash shell as base), but it is
> massive work since we need to s
On Tue, 2007-01-23 at 13:02 -0500, Morrison, Tom wrote:
> We actually have one of these - and the H/W engineer is NOT
> happy at all. Apparently, it is NOT that stable for single
> step operations, and does NOT give a consistent view of the
> All the internal registers and/or the ability to view a
On Fri, 2007-01-19 at 12:14 -0800, Russell McGuire wrote:
> Ben,
>
> That could be the problem
>
> I am building using ARCH=ppc
>
> What is the difference between the two?
>
I'm not by any means the expert, but I believe that ARCH=powerpc is a
merge of 32 and 64 bit PowerPC architectures (plus
Russell,
On Fri, 2007-01-19 at 11:28 -0800, Russell McGuire wrote:
>
> arch/ppc/boot/common/ns16550.c error: ‘SERIAL_PORT_DFNS’ undeclared
> here ……
>
I don't think you should be building any code there... Are you using
ARCH=powerpc (you should be)
regards,
Ben
_
Hello,
I'm porting my board from 2.6.17 to 2.6.19 kernel, and
now external interrupts aren't working any more. I'm
using ARCH=powerpc on an MPC8349-based custom board.
With the old code, we called ipic_init() from board
init code with a table of IRQ senses. In the newer
kernel, ipic_init() take
Vitaly,
>
> Yes, I was thinking about something like 0:1001 or
> 0:101 where 1 at the end respects duplexity.
> Putting it into devtree is good but we'll need to
> unify the interface first.
>
I'm sure you're working on lots of other things right
now, so I'll go ahead and code something like thi
Thanks Vitaly!
--- Vitaly Bordug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No, you do not miss - this is an issue. In fact MDIO
> bus was changed for numeric for gianfar-stuff, and
> has been remaining string for fs_enet. I think it
> makes sense to average this up, and will try to do
> that once will get 834
Hello,
My custom board has a couple of Ethernet switches attached via RvMII to
the 'Gianfar' controllers of an MPC8349 CPU. We're using SPI instead of
MDIO for control of the switches, and it looked like the 'fixed.c' PHY
driver was the right thing to use. BTW, I'm using a 2.6.19 kernel.
When I
Henk,
On Wed, 2006-12-13 at 21:59 +0100, Henk Stegeman wrote:
> I'm working on an SPI procol driver on the MPC52XX.
> I spend some time in trying to find the best location for calling
> spi_register_board_info () (which basically registers the relations
> between protocol drivers and the SPI chip
On Wed, 2006-12-13 at 08:20 -0800, jimmy liu wrote:
> We has a hardware driver need the floating point
> operation to do timing recover. Maybe, we have to do
> it in user space.
>
Have you considered doing the math in fixed point instead? I realize
that certain data sets make this difficult but t
On Wed, 2006-11-29 at 19:10 -0800, Muruga Ganapathy wrote:
> The error message might be due to the wrong/improper configuration of
> interrupt and its attributes like whether it is level/edge sensitive.
>
> G.Muruganandam
>
Thanks Ganapathy. Turns out it was a hardware problem. In True IDE
mo
Hi Bala,
On Thu, 2006-11-30 at 14:58 +0530, s.balamurugan wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> This is bala, I am using MPC8360 board and compact
> flash is connected via Local Bus Controller(UPM).
> I have the following questions
> what are the necessary document to be read for writting
Hello,
I'm bringing up the Compact Flash interface on a custom board and am
almost there, but not quite. I've seen many messages in the past about
the 'lost interrupt' message, but I couldn't find anything corresponding
closely to my situation. Can anyone shed some light?
Here's a snippet of Li
On Thu, 2006-09-21 at 19:11 +0800, enorm wrote:
> After power on, cpu reads instruction from certain addr. But how does it
> know how many bits he can read at once.
This can't be generalized. Read the "Reset, Clocking and
Initialization", or equivalent, chapter of your CPU's reference manual.
On Tue, 2006-09-12 at 10:13 -0400, Sachin Rane wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using AMCC PPC440GX evaluation board.
> I want to access serial EEPROM (AP31_U29) present on the board.
> I couldn't find the I2C address for this chip in the board manuals.
>
> Could you tell me where I can find it?
>
Thes
On Tue, 2006-09-12 at 10:13 -0400, Sachin Rane wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using AMCC PPC440GX evaluation board.
> I want to access serial EEPROM (AP31_U29) present on the board.
> I couldn't find the I2C address for this chip in the board manuals.
>
> Could you tell me where I can find it?
>
Thes
Tim,
--- "Martin, Tim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When I just telnet
> locally from the serial console to the board (using
> the loopback IP
> 127.0.0.1) the telnet daemon connects, but the login
> program doesn't
> give me a chance to type a username or login.
>
> Question: What stupid t
Tim,
--- "Martin, Tim" wrote:
> When I just telnet
> locally from the serial console to the board (using
> the loopback IP
> 127.0.0.1) the telnet daemon connects, but the login
> program doesn't
> give me a chance to type a username or login.
>
> Question: What stupid thing have I done to
Thanks Vitaly,
On Thu, 2006-08-24 at 22:06 +0400, Vitaly Bordug wrote:
> I'd suggest to make a look at LDD concerning linux device model...
Thanks. I'll read it again. My little brain absorbs this stuff very
slowly.
> For platform device, there's no need to cope with u-boot at all. You'll
> pr
Kumar,
On Thu, 2006-08-24 at 13:25 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> The only code in u-boot was the UPM setup code, I'm happy to send
> that to you.
>
If it's no trouble, that would be great. My HW guy is calculating the
settings, but this stuff can be frustrating to debug. BTW - was the
system bu
Hello,
A 'newbie-to-platform-devices' question:
In a patch that Kumar just sent for a compact flash device, the resource
data (I/O addresses, IRQ # etc.) are retrieved from the platform system.
I guess I can either modify the device tree in U-boot by adding
additional nodes, or instantiate a plat
Thanks Kumar,
As always, you're several steps ahead of me.
On Wed, 2006-08-23 at 18:04 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> I know I posted a patch for cf-ide.c to lkml some time ago, this was
> to do a CF in true ide mode using the 83xx localbus.
>
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=1138
Hello,
I have a custom board where we've hung a CompactFlash on the local bus
of an MPC8349 processor, intending to use it in 'True IDE' mode. The
closest thing I've found in the kernel tree is
drivers/ide/ppc/ide-m8xx.c, although it's *very* possible I'm not
looking in the right place.
I beli
Keith,
On Wed, 2006-08-16 at 10:53 +0200, Keith Redfern wrote:
> I am trying to dynamically link busybox with the correct libraries but
> run into problems with directory paths and CC/LD flags.
>
> I am using the toolchain supplied with ELDK and my target board is
> ppc_8xx based. The busybox ver
Martin,
On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 13:12 -0700, Martin, Tim wrote:
>
> I tried this as well and have the same GDB synchronization problem e.g.
>
> break log_stuff
> commands
>silent
>if (variable_logging_enabled)
> printf "(%d,%d)\n",stuff1_variable,stuff2_variable
>end
>
Tim,
How about something a bit simpler like running gdb within a 'script'
context, which will log your session to a file. Get gdb to print the
variables to the screen (using 'print' or whatever), wrap your data with
easily searchable characters (eg. ***data1 data2 data3***), then filter
your data
On Fri, 2006-08-04 at 22:11 +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Yes, SuSE has always found interesting ways to break compatibility.
> That's why I avoid it. IIRC, SuSE provides a special tool "linux32"
> which has to be used to run 32-bit applications on a x86_64 system.
>
> Don't ask me why the
Arun,
Please keep the mailing list CC'd on all correspondence. As you can
see, I've been busy for the past week and am sure there are others
listening that are more qualified to answer. Anyway...
On Wed, 2006-07-26 at 17:33 +0530, Arun Kumar wrote:
> Hi Ben ,
> I guess this is the last stage be
Arun,
Looks like there are still some things broken in your MTD partition
definition. I highly recommend that when debugging this, you boot from
an NFS mount. That way you can modify files off-line (ie. from your
development host). I'll point out a few things, but you're going to
have to surf t
Hi Arun,
On Fri, 2006-07-21 at 20:26 +0530, Arun Kumar wrote:
> Hi ,
> Can anyone help me in this naive problem ?
>
Then a naive answer is most fitting... Turns out that's my specialty.
> #
> # Memory Technology Devices (MTD)
> #
> CONFIG_MTD=y
> CONFIG_MTD_DEBUG=y
> CONFIG_MTD_DEBUG_VERBOSE=2
Way cool! Thanks a lot. I'll try it out when my hardware comes in...
regards,
Ben
On Thu, 2006-07-20 at 13:51 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> On Jul 20, 2006, at 10:16 AM, Ben Warren wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Has anyone implemented devices like the Philips PCA954
Thanks Travis,
On Thu, 2006-07-20 at 11:22 -0400, Travis B. Sawyer wrote:
> I have a driver for 2.4.x that works with our SFP/XFPs. We also have a
> bunch of other 'stuff'
> hanging off of muxes. I haven't given it a go on 2.6, but I have it
> compiled and it doesn't complain on
> startup.
Hello,
Has anyone implemented devices like the Philips PCA954x I2C bus muxes
under the /sysfs device model? I have some optical transponders on my
board that through the wisdom of some committee all have the same fixed
I2C address. To get around this, we put them behind muxes, creating
'virtual'
/proc/modules support is in 2.4, but the other stuff is 2.6 only (I
believe somewhere around 2.6.11 or so?) You should be able to 'insmod
-m' in 2.4. You may need to reconfigure busybox or use a non-busybox
'insmod', though.
cheers,
Ben
On Thu, 2006-07-13 at 23:27 +0200, Antonio Di Bacco wrote
cat /proc/modules
If you want more detailed information about a module (locations
of .text, .data, .bss etc), enable CONFIG_KALLSYMS in your kernel and
you'll see lots of goodness in the /sys/module//sections
directory.
Do yourself a favor and browse http://lwn.net/Articles/driver-porting/
where
On Mon, 2006-07-03 at 15:38 -0400, Ben Warren wrote:
> This is starting to look to me like a generation-time issue. I built
> another JFFS2 partition out of a random directory on my workstation, and
> it's behaving properly:
Sorry for filling people's inboxes, but it turns
Mathieu,
>
> IMHO, it's not a generation-time issue
>
This is starting to look to me like a generation-time issue. I built
another JFFS2 partition out of a random directory on my workstation, and
it's behaving properly:
$mkfs.jffs2 -U -d util -b -e 0x2 -o /tftpboot/prism/myutil.img
On the
Chetan,
On Mon, 2006-07-03 at 10:18 -0400, Anantharaman Chetan-W16155 wrote:
> Did you check to see if your flash banks are unlocked?
>
According to U-Boot, only the first four sectors are locked. My JFFS2
partition is in sectors 37-52 (1-based). I'll definitely look more
deeply into this, th
Mathieu,
Thanks for responding!
On Mon, 2006-07-03 at 12:42 +0200, Mathieu Deschamps wrote:
> >
> Do you mean that you can't even created a void file on / as root ? Else
> can you then put for instance text in it ? My point is can or can't you
> first create a new fs node and then can you write
Hello,
When I boot from a JFFS2 file system on my eval board, the file system
is effectively read-only, and I can't figure out why. I'm pretty sure
the kernel's configured for R/W MTD block access. Any help is greatly
appreciated.
The hardware in use is:
Freescale MPC8349EMDS eval board.
8M
Hello,
Does anybody have a solid config file for the Freescale MPC8349EMDS eval
board? I guess the MPC8349ADS would be fine too, since I've been told
they're the same thing. I've been tweaking the file named
'mcp8349e.cfg' that shipped with the BDI, but it's a bit flaky with my
board. In partic
Sorry for wasting bandwidth (again). Turns out my schematic is for an
earlier spin of the board.
regards,
Ben
On Mon, 2006-04-10 at 15:06 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> On Apr 10, 2006, at 2:48 PM, Ben Warren wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm a noobie to this CPU, and
Hello,
I'm a noobie to this CPU, and am utterly confused with how the bits are
ordered on the GPIO ports. I imagine it's the same as all Freescale
PPCs, but who knows. Anyway...
Using an MPC8349MDS eval board, I have one LED to play with. From the
schematic, it's connected to GPIO1[1]. From o
86 matches
Mail list logo
