Re: [i2c] [PATCH] i2c-mpc: work around missing-9th-clock-pulse bug

2007-07-20 Thread Guennadi Liakhovetski
On Mon, 9 Jul 2007, Domen Puncer wrote: Work around a problem reported on: http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-embedded/2005-July/019038.html Without this patch I2C on mpc5200 becomes unusable after a while. Tested on mpc5200 based boards by Matthias and me. Domen, unfortunately, your

Re: [PATCH] i2c-mpc: work around missing-9th-clock-pulse bug

2007-07-11 Thread Grant Likely
On 7/10/07, Domen Puncer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 10/07/07 14:40 +0200, Jean Delvare wrote: Hi Grant, hi Domen, On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 00:22:05 -0600, Grant Likely wrote: On 7/10/07, Domen Puncer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Work around a problem reported on:

Re: [PATCH] i2c-mpc: work around missing-9th-clock-pulse bug

2007-07-11 Thread Domen Puncer
On 11/07/07 00:03 -0600, Grant Likely wrote: On 7/10/07, Domen Puncer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 10/07/07 14:40 +0200, Jean Delvare wrote: ... +/* Sometimes 9th clock pulse isn't generated, so slave doesn't release + * the bus. Documented and suggested workaround on + *

Re: [PATCH] i2c-mpc: work around missing-9th-clock-pulse bug

2007-07-11 Thread Jean Delvare
Hi Domen, On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 08:33:35 +0200, Domen Puncer wrote: On 11/07/07 00:03 -0600, Grant Likely wrote: I don't think it's a great idea to use a link; You should copy the important parts into the .c file. Archives may not be forever, and links cannot be read when offline. If the

Re: [PATCH] i2c-mpc: work around missing-9th-clock-pulse bug

2007-07-10 Thread Domen Puncer
On 09/07/07 09:53 -0600, Grant Likely wrote: On 7/9/07, Domen Puncer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Work around a problem reported on: http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-embedded/2005-July/019038.html Without this patch I2C on mpc5200 becomes unusable after a while. Tested on mpc5200 based boards

Re: [PATCH] i2c-mpc: work around missing-9th-clock-pulse bug

2007-07-10 Thread Grant Likely
On 7/10/07, Domen Puncer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 09/07/07 09:53 -0600, Grant Likely wrote: On 7/9/07, Domen Puncer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Work around a problem reported on: http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-embedded/2005-July/019038.html Without this patch I2C on mpc5200 becomes

Re: [PATCH] i2c-mpc: work around missing-9th-clock-pulse bug

2007-07-10 Thread Jean Delvare
Hi Grant, hi Domen, On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 00:22:05 -0600, Grant Likely wrote: On 7/10/07, Domen Puncer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Work around a problem reported on: http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-embedded/2005-July/019038.html Without this patch I2C on mpc5200 becomes unusable after a

Re: [PATCH] i2c-mpc: work around missing-9th-clock-pulse bug

2007-07-10 Thread Domen Puncer
On 10/07/07 14:40 +0200, Jean Delvare wrote: Hi Grant, hi Domen, On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 00:22:05 -0600, Grant Likely wrote: On 7/10/07, Domen Puncer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Work around a problem reported on: http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-embedded/2005-July/019038.html Without

[PATCH] i2c-mpc: work around missing-9th-clock-pulse bug

2007-07-09 Thread Domen Puncer
Work around a problem reported on: http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-embedded/2005-July/019038.html Without this patch I2C on mpc5200 becomes unusable after a while. Tested on mpc5200 based boards by Matthias and me. Signed-off-by: Domen Puncer [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---

Re: [PATCH] i2c-mpc: work around missing-9th-clock-pulse bug

2007-07-09 Thread Grant Likely
On 7/9/07, Domen Puncer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Work around a problem reported on: http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-embedded/2005-July/019038.html Without this patch I2C on mpc5200 becomes unusable after a while. Tested on mpc5200 based boards by Matthias and me. Index: