On Jan 21, 2008 12:36 AM, Mohammad Sadegh Sadri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As you know Xilinx PLB TEMAC is a module which connects Hard TEMAC in
> Virtex-4 FX devices to PLB bus,
> now, in the new release of EDK , EDK 9.2 Xilinx has added a new interface
> core , which is called XPS_LL_TEMAC and
which projects are now
hosted by it?
thanks
> Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 00:54:30 -0700
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Xilinx XPS_LL_TEMAC vs PLB_TEMAC
>
> On Jan 21, 2008 12:36 AM, Mohammad Sadegh Sadri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > A
how we can access it and which projects are
now hosted by it?
thanks
> Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 00:54:30 -0700
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Xilinx XPS_LL_TEMAC vs PLB_TEMAC
>
> On Jan 21, 2008 12:36 AM, Mohammad Sadegh Sadri
<[EMAIL PROT
nuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
> Subject: RE: Xilinx XPS_LL_TEMAC vs PLB_TEMAC
>
> thanks for you reply david,
>
> As far as I know the Linux driver for Xilinx PLB TEMAC was two parts :
1- adapter.c and 2- the rest
> of the driver files
>
> Only adapter.c was really a linux rela
give
it a try...thanks for info.
well, what about Grant Likely... and his git tree?
Subject: RE: Xilinx XPS_LL_TEMAC vs PLB_TEMAC
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 11:44:14 -0600
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
In case anyone is inter
ry 23, 2008 2:36 AM
To: Koss, Mike (Mission Systems); David Baird;
linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
Subject: RE: Xilinx XPS_LL_TEMAC vs PLB_TEMAC
Hi
Well, As you know, we now need a PLB version, XPS_LL_TEMAC is connected
to PLB not MPMC2...yes I remember those days of Xilinx GSRD and MPMC2
however it
So, in this case, our base system, created with EDK 9.2 will not be the same as
previous systems, as shown in
http://www.xilinx.com/esp/wired/optical/xlnx_net/mpmc.htm
PLB and OPB usage is limited to a small area of design...
Subject: RE: Xilinx XPS_LL_TEMAC vs PLB_TEMAC
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008
inuxppc-embedded-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mohammad
Sadegh Sadri
> Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 7:13 AM
> To: Koss, Mike (Mission Systems); David Baird;
linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
> Subject: RE: Xilinx XPS_LL_TEMAC vs PLB_TEMAC
>
> So, in this case, our base system
