getting support for command-line flash partitioning

2004-07-01 Thread Sylvain Munaut
Robert P. J. Day wrote: | and neither the latest "bk pull" of the 2.5/2.6 kernel from | bkbits.net, or the standard 2.6 kernel on my fedora core system has | *any* support for that feature in the map files (even though the | kernel has the internal support). | Are you sure about that ? tnt at 24

getting support for command-line flash partitioning

2004-07-01 Thread David Woodhouse
On Thu, 2004-07-01 at 10:45 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: >so how is this being added to the files? as in, who will add this > feature to the individual files, and get it pushed upstream, if that's > what's going to happen? just curious as to how this feature will > eventually end up in the

getting support for command-line flash partitioning

2004-07-01 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Thu, 1 Jul 2004, Sylvain Munaut wrote: > Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > | and neither the latest "bk pull" of the 2.5/2.6 kernel from > | bkbits.net, or the standard 2.6 kernel on my fedora core system has > | *any* support for that feature in the map files (even though the > | kernel has the int

getting support for command-line flash partitioning

2004-07-01 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Thu, 1 Jul 2004, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Thu, 2004-07-01 at 10:45 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: >>so how is this being added to the files? as in, who will add this >> feature to the individual files, and get it pushed upstream, if that's >> what's going to happen? just curious as to

getting support for command-line flash partitioning

2004-07-01 Thread Robert P. J. Day
looking a bit more into command-line flash partitioning, i noticed the following, and i just want to make sure i understand the current state of this feature. first, there's a fair amount of support for CONFIG_MTD_CMDLINE_PARTS in the current denx (2.4.25) ppc kernel; that is, in the source